Been pondering this for quite a while—the AI product landscape really is skewed toward enterprise solutions. You look around and maybe 1 in 10 teams are actually building B2C AI tools that solve real problems for regular people. The rest? They're chasing institutional deals, raising bigger rounds, going after what's easier to pitch.



Not surprising though. When capital flows in one direction and everyone sees the same playbook working, it's tough to stick out. The market signals are pointing hard toward the 'legible' path—easier valuations, clearer metrics, safer bets. Breaking that pattern takes real conviction and a slightly different risk appetite than most founders have right now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 7h ago
Well... to be honest, capital just loves chasing hot trends, so it's not surprising that B2C has been marginalized.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxietyvip
· 14h ago
There are really so few B2C AI products that they are all locked up by enterprise-level solutions.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMintervip
· 15h ago
ngl is just that capital is too lazy; entrepreneurs who truly dare to do C-end businesses have long been marginalized.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 15h ago
NGL, this is the reality. Money flows to the enterprise side. Who would still dare to gamble on consumer-grade?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)