Social engagement metrics alone won't cut it anymore when evaluating account credibility. The crypto community is shifting away from treating post counts and interaction volume as the primary indicators of account quality. Real influence now depends on actual contribution value, community reputation, and proven track record rather than just raw activity numbers. This marks a meaningful evolution in how we assess authentic community participation versus inflated vanity metrics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-15 20:20
It should have been like this a long time ago. Metrics like follower count and engagement are already everywhere. What truly matters is whether someone can genuinely deliver value, not the fake hype created by bots.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 01-15 20:20
It should have been like this a long time ago. Accounts that only spam data should have been eliminated long ago.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 01-15 20:19
I've already said it, those who inflate data are all paper tigers; actual contribution is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-15 20:03
Really, what's the use of having a large number of followers? The key is to see what you truly contribute to the community.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-15 19:58
It should have been like this a long time ago; the era of data spamming must die.
Social engagement metrics alone won't cut it anymore when evaluating account credibility. The crypto community is shifting away from treating post counts and interaction volume as the primary indicators of account quality. Real influence now depends on actual contribution value, community reputation, and proven track record rather than just raw activity numbers. This marks a meaningful evolution in how we assess authentic community participation versus inflated vanity metrics.