We have completed the system review of the final voting phase and found anomalies in the statistics for the 4th place ranking. To protect the integrity of the event, we have always adhered to the core principle of "one account, one vote."
What did this review highlight? Simply put, there were irregularities during the voting process. Our stance is very clear — every participant should compete under fair rules, and no one should receive special treatment.
Next, we will adjust the relevant rankings based on the review results. This is not just about correcting scores but also about maintaining the community's confidence in fair competition. Transparency and honesty are the foundation of any successful competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-40edb63b
· 3h ago
Wow, that move at position 4... turns out there's no absolute fairness.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 12h ago
Looking at this, what's going on with that guy in 4th place... Has he really been exposed?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 12h ago
Haha, the 4th place is probably going to be out of the running. After all that, someone is still cheating.
Is the voting system so easy to manipulate? It needs to be thoroughly investigated.
Finally, someone dares to speak out about this, and it has to be dealt with like this.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 12h ago
Wow, can the 4th place still have data anomalies? How outrageous is that?
I've been saying the voting system needs a thorough check, and now it's been exposed.
Alright, at least they have the courage to come clean, which is better than sneaky tricks.
Really? Has the principle of "one account, one vote" been implemented? I find it hard to believe.
Now those who rely on vote spamming to get on the list must be panicking.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 12h ago
Haha, finally someone started the review. The move in the 4th place was indeed quite outrageous.
Hackathon Voting Review Results Announcement
We have completed the system review of the final voting phase and found anomalies in the statistics for the 4th place ranking. To protect the integrity of the event, we have always adhered to the core principle of "one account, one vote."
What did this review highlight? Simply put, there were irregularities during the voting process. Our stance is very clear — every participant should compete under fair rules, and no one should receive special treatment.
Next, we will adjust the relevant rankings based on the review results. This is not just about correcting scores but also about maintaining the community's confidence in fair competition. Transparency and honesty are the foundation of any successful competition.