Anyone else thinking it's time to shift focus back to Farcaster and Base? There's something about dedicating energy to Layer 2 solutions and decentralized social platforms that just makes more sense right now. The ecosystem's matured enough that we don't need to spread ourselves so thin across every new thing that pops up. Base is showing real momentum with on-chain activity, and Farcaster keeps building out that open protocol vision. Maybe it's worth reconsidering where we're putting our attention in this space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
tx_pending_forevervip
· 01-15 20:29
NGL base's on-chain activity is indeed increasing, but can Farcaster really break through the circle?
View OriginalReply0
FadCatchervip
· 01-15 20:23
NGL, the on-chain activity of base has indeed picked up, but I really don't feel much about how Farcaster is doing.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamervip
· 01-15 20:20
NGL Base this time really has some potential, but how is the user retention on Farcaster?
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMinervip
· 01-15 20:19
Base and Farcaster double flight, now that's the right way to go
View OriginalReply0
PermabullPetevip
· 01-15 20:14
NGL, the Farcaster protocol is indeed interesting, but the gas fees on Base are still too outrageous haha
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt