To clarify my stance. I am not bearish on Intel, nor have I fully sold out. I have simply reduced my position and sold some call options.
I believe Intel will eventually turn around, and I am aware that it might experience a wild rebound similar to the storage sector. Where's the problem? Price.
At the $50 level, the reality is: from a one-year perspective, Intel's value for money is not as good as Nvidia; from a three-month short-term view, it’s not as good as Microsoft. This is not bearishness, just data.
Something that is likely to skyrocket does not in itself justify chasing in. What truly matters is the symmetry of risk and reward. The current issue is precisely—the asymmetry between the downside risk and the upside potential, and that is the basis for decision-making.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 17h ago
Oh, no, there's nothing wrong with this logic. It's just a matter of cost-effectiveness.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 17h ago
I understand the reasoning, but the 50-dollar level isn't very attractive right now. It's not too late to buy if it drops a bit more.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 17h ago
Speaking of which, the larger downside potential is indeed something to think through carefully. Even if you're optimistic, you shouldn't get carried away and chase after it.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 17h ago
Basically, it's just being cowardly, waiting for the rebound to get in, the smart way to live.
To clarify my stance. I am not bearish on Intel, nor have I fully sold out. I have simply reduced my position and sold some call options.
I believe Intel will eventually turn around, and I am aware that it might experience a wild rebound similar to the storage sector. Where's the problem? Price.
At the $50 level, the reality is: from a one-year perspective, Intel's value for money is not as good as Nvidia; from a three-month short-term view, it’s not as good as Microsoft. This is not bearishness, just data.
Something that is likely to skyrocket does not in itself justify chasing in. What truly matters is the symmetry of risk and reward. The current issue is precisely—the asymmetry between the downside risk and the upside potential, and that is the basis for decision-making.