2026-01-15 20:23:44

When it comes to privacy in the cryptocurrency space, most people think of those old-school projects claiming to be "absolutely anonymous." But in the eyes of genuine financial institutions, privacy isn't about evading regulation; it's about protecting business secrets. Dusk Foundation has identified this gap.

What they are doing isn't simple obfuscation but building a vault on-chain that prevents snooping while still leaving compliant channels open. In plain language: transactions run as a black box, but auditors can still produce compliance proofs when needed. This "both fish and bear's paw" design is exactly the barrier for traditional finance to enter Web3.

Currently, the market is buzzing about RWA (Real-World Asset on-chain), but imagine a asset management company issuing bonds on-chain—how could it let competitors see its holdings and transaction prices through a browser? Without eliminating such concerns, major capital won't enter. Dusk's Piecrust virtual machine and zero-knowledge proof solutions address this pain point—not for show, but directly targeting real business needs.

The L1 race is indeed crowded. Why does Dusk stand out? The key is its SA-PoS consensus mechanism. The barrier to entry isn't high—no need to buy expensive mining hardware; just staking tokens to participate in validation, with faster transaction confirmation. This design allows ordinary users to help maintain the network and reduces centralization risks.

From another perspective, privacy and compliance are often seen as opposites. But Dusk's approach is to stitch them together with technology. This isn't just a tech showcase but a real bridge between traditional finance and the decentralized world.

DUSK-4,14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 5h ago

Oh wow, finally someone is talking about the real issues of privacy, not those "absolutely anonymous" nonsense. We all know that big institutions are the true parents; they don't care about avoiding regulation at all. They just want to prevent competitors from peeking at their holdings. Dusk's approach hits the mark perfectly. The key is that SA-PoS really lowers the participation barrier. No need for hardware stacking; just staking to play. This kind of design is truly a lifeline for retail investors. Do privacy and compliance have to be mortal enemies? Just patch them together. It sounds simple, but few projects can actually do it well. It depends on whether they can truly attract the giants of traditional finance later on. In this wave of RWA hype, whoever can solve the issue of business secrets will be the winner. It feels like Dusk has found that gap. However, there are too many L1s. Only a few will survive in the end. Whether Dusk can break out depends on the quality of its real-world applications.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 5h ago

Indeed, they’ve identified the pain points. Traditional financial giants are just afraid that competitors will see through their cards. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are more like a business firewall than just privacy; that’s a fresh perspective. --- SA-PoS has a low barrier to entry, sounds good, but what really attracts institutions is probably that compliance certification. --- Can privacy and compliance truly be stitched together? I have my doubts. Will it end up pleasing neither side? --- The key bottleneck for RWA on-chain is right here. Whoever solves it first wins half the battle. --- It’s not just about avoiding regulation but protecting trade secrets. This positioning is the first time I’ve heard it explained so clearly. --- Staking for validation sounds accessible to the masses, but how are liquidity costs and risks actually calculated? --- Technically stitching privacy and compliance sounds good, but will the execution face challenges? --- Layer 1 is too crowded. Can Dusk’s path succeed, or is it just another hype project? --- Is the barrier for traditional finance to enter Web3 really that high? It feels a bit exaggerated.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 5h ago

Oops, Dusk's move really hit the mark. That's exactly what financial institutions want. Exactly, privacy ≠ tax evasion. RWA needs to solve this trust issue before taking off. SA-PoS is pretty good; it's more rational than PoW, which just burns money. Zero-knowledge proofs sound abstract, but if they can really help traditional finance step in, it's worth it. Even if Layer 1 gets crowded, someone will still eat the meat. Let's see if Dusk can stand out from the crowd. This is a pragmatic approach, not for the sake of status, but genuinely solving problems. Achieving both compliance and privacy? If that's possible, it's more than just a technological breakthrough. Feels like Dusk understands this much better than those projects that just shout about anonymity all day.

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 5h ago

The compliance channel indeed has some substance, but can RWA really generate volume? --- I'm tired of hearing about zero-knowledge proofs; the one that truly attracts traditional finance is that compliance proof. --- SA-PoS sounds good, but with so many L1s, why is Dusk the winner? --- Having both fish and bear paws sounds great, but how much can actually be achieved... --- Privacy + compliance is indeed a different approach, but it requires real institutions with real money to verify. --- Can staking participate in validation? I like this logic, much more honest than those mining hardware manufacturers. --- Basically, it's a privacy solution tailored for large capital, and this idea really hits the pain point. --- Virtual machines and zero-knowledge proofs are both implemented; the tech stack looks solid, now just see how the market reacts. --- Hiding position data on-chain is indeed a must-have for traditional fund managers. --- I have to give credit for not spending money on mining hardware; the democratization of consensus mechanisms should be promoted.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 5h ago

Wait, can privacy and compliance really be stitched together? Or is it just another PPT project full of hype...

View OriginalReply0

Lonely_Validator

· 5h ago

This idea is indeed good, but will RWA really come? It seems that institutions are still afraid of those on-chain matters.

View OriginalReply0