You can distinguish who stands where by observing their stance on freedom of speech. Those pushing censorship and speech restrictions? That's authoritarianism dressed up. It's straightforward—if someone advocates for limiting what people can say, they're essentially revealing where they really stand on freedom itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArtisanHQ
· 5h ago
ngl this whole "censorship = authoritarianism" take feels like it's missing the actual ontological complexity here. like... who defines the boundaries of speech itself? that's the real meta-narrative we should be deconstructing, no?
Reply0
0xDreamChaser
· 5h ago
Freedom of speech is something some people talk about eloquently, but then turn around and want to silence you. Truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 5h ago
Freedom of speech is a litmus test; anyone who wants to implement censorship is simply seeking authoritarianism. It's nothing complicated.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 5h ago
Censorship makes it obvious who belongs to that group; frankly, it's just a dictatorship vendor in disguise.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_early
· 5h ago
ngl Freedom of speech is like a mirror that reveals all, anyone wanting to impose censorship will have to face the consequences.
You can distinguish who stands where by observing their stance on freedom of speech. Those pushing censorship and speech restrictions? That's authoritarianism dressed up. It's straightforward—if someone advocates for limiting what people can say, they're essentially revealing where they really stand on freedom itself.