The "short" part of airdrop distribution isn't necessarily a bad thing. At first glance, it may seem like a loss, but from a different perspective—those tokens that ultimately weren't distributed ended up in users' hands. Rather than saying it reduces gains, it's more accurate to say it adjusts the way they are obtained. This kind of mechanism design actually makes the overall distribution more reasonable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 4h ago
By the way, I feel like this set of logic is a bit of a recursive loop.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 5h ago
Uh... this logic is a bit too optimistic. The undistributed tokens "ultimately flow to users"? That statement needs to be confirmed by the audit report, otherwise it's just Schrödinger's promise. I've seen many projects' "reasonable distribution mechanisms" end up becoming a breeding ground for contract vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 5h ago
Sounds nice, but it's just the project team wanting to hold some chips.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 5h ago
Haha, this logic is indeed a bit convoluted, but upon closer thought, it actually makes some sense.
If you think about it this way, it’s like the crypto world’s "cut losses in time" haha.
Can a short position also turn around? Well, we’ll have to see how it develops next.
Instead of waiting for a short squeeze, it’s better to get in early—that’s the hard truth.
That said, the real key is the timing when the funds actually reach the users.
I’ve heard this "look at it from a different perspective" so many times...
Oh my god, another "distribution optimization" excuse. I’m tired of hearing this phrase.
I agree, it’s actually more fair and doesn’t cut into beginners as much.
The "short" part of airdrop distribution isn't necessarily a bad thing. At first glance, it may seem like a loss, but from a different perspective—those tokens that ultimately weren't distributed ended up in users' hands. Rather than saying it reduces gains, it's more accurate to say it adjusts the way they are obtained. This kind of mechanism design actually makes the overall distribution more reasonable.