In the recent funding boom, a leading exchange is becoming a transfer hub. The last round was dominated by BG, so why is it this exchange's turn now? The landscape is indeed changing.
To assess project quality, simply look at this exchange's contract and spot trading data—don't rely on intuition.
But honestly, don't expect any project to become the next Alpha. Why? The funding amounts are getting smaller and smaller. If you can really pull in 50-100M in volume, I would buy immediately without hesitation. The problem is that now, the amounts are just crumbs. As soon as they go live, there's a quick surge, but some even start to decline afterward—that's the current situation. Betting on which will explode is basically gambling on luck, and the more you gamble, the more you lose. Calmly analyzing data is much more reliable than chasing risky projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Whale_Whisperer
· 7h ago
The amount of funding is getting smaller, and that's true. Checking exchange data is more reliable than just hearing stories.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 7h ago
Data is the real thing; everything else feels like a scam. The projects that come up now are just small amounts; they launch and then quickly fade away. It's not worth gambling on at all.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 8h ago
Here we go again. This round of funding hype is just the exchange's self-congratulatory party, essentially a new way to cut leeks.
Can contract data speak? I’m damn well the one watching contracts get liquidated.
50-100M is called funding? Dream on. What’s coming up now are just small scraps worth a few million. As soon as they go live, they pump the price. I haven’t even reacted before I’m already bleeding heavily.
Instead of betting on these trash projects, it’s better to honestly study risk control points. Don’t ask me how I know—I've been forcibly liquidated again.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 8h ago
The financing limit has plummeted so dramatically, and those still daring to go all-in are truly warriors.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 8h ago
This round of funding is indeed interesting; the exchange acting as a hub is becoming more and more skilled.
Data can speak, but I feel it's unreliable, and I agree with that.
But honestly, the projects coming up now really don't have much large-scale funding—50-100M? Don't even think about it. Once they go live, they just get a wave of hype, then either fall or get sold off; this cycle is all too familiar.
Instead of blindly gambling, it's better to watch the K-line; at least you can lose less.
In the recent funding boom, a leading exchange is becoming a transfer hub. The last round was dominated by BG, so why is it this exchange's turn now? The landscape is indeed changing.
To assess project quality, simply look at this exchange's contract and spot trading data—don't rely on intuition.
But honestly, don't expect any project to become the next Alpha. Why? The funding amounts are getting smaller and smaller. If you can really pull in 50-100M in volume, I would buy immediately without hesitation. The problem is that now, the amounts are just crumbs. As soon as they go live, there's a quick surge, but some even start to decline afterward—that's the current situation. Betting on which will explode is basically gambling on luck, and the more you gamble, the more you lose. Calmly analyzing data is much more reliable than chasing risky projects.