In the Solana ecosystem, you don't have to be constantly on edge, fearing that a single word from the founder will change the project's direction and cause you to be trapped. In comparison, the situation on Binance Smart Chain is much more complicated — at least you have to keep an eye on the actions of three key individuals.
But then again, there's no other way. The market's judgment is always the final arbiter, regardless of how the on-chain governance structure is designed. Some things are just like that; no matter how much you try to prevent them, you can't outrun the invisible hand of the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeDodger
· 1h ago
Listen, the way people talk about Solana is a bit naive. The founders not stepping out to cause trouble is just temporary; don’t celebrate too early. BSC is indeed complicated, but at the end of the day, it’s all the same game—seeing who has more influence.
---
They say the invisible hand of the market is beautiful, but I just want to ask—what about the people who get cut?
---
Really, all governance structures are虚的; in the end, it still depends on how big players and whales play.
---
Solana’s recent publicity is a bit over the top, feels like self-comfort.
---
I just want to know, next time if the founder becomes an opponent, how should everyone respond?
---
Can't defend against the market? No, what can’t be defended against are those who hold power and are clever.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 8h ago
So after all that, it's still about gambling. No matter how perfect the governance is, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 8h ago
In other words, Solana doesn't have as many surprises, while BSC needs to keep a close eye at all times. But ultimately, it's still a matter of competing with the market. No matter how perfect the governance mechanism is, it can't withstand a sharp decline.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 8h ago
Afraid of being trapped by a founder’s words, it's better to just trust the market's unpredictability.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 8h ago
Ha, you're right, the market will ultimately speak.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 8h ago
Oh, it's still that old saying: no matter how perfect the governance structure is, it can't withstand a market crash. You can prevent big V's trash talk, but you can't prevent capital from flowing out.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 9h ago
Bro, that really hits home. Over on BSC, you really have to have eyes on the back of your head.
In the Solana ecosystem, you don't have to be constantly on edge, fearing that a single word from the founder will change the project's direction and cause you to be trapped. In comparison, the situation on Binance Smart Chain is much more complicated — at least you have to keep an eye on the actions of three key individuals.
But then again, there's no other way. The market's judgment is always the final arbiter, regardless of how the on-chain governance structure is designed. Some things are just like that; no matter how much you try to prevent them, you can't outrun the invisible hand of the market.