Will 2026 be the year of AI concept coins? Many investors are betting on the growth potential of several popular tokens. From a technological application perspective, TAO is expected to break through $1000, RENDER is anticipated to rise to $15 thanks to GPU rendering capabilities, NEAR aims for a target price of $12 as an efficient public chain, and AI concept coins like FET and PAAL are also optimistic about reaching the $5 mark. Additionally, there is discussion about whether emerging projects like M87 can reach $0.1. These predictions reflect the market's confidence in the long-term prospects of the AI track. Which project do you think is more promising? Opportunities and risks coexist in this AI cycle; choosing a path depends on individual risk preferences and research depth.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropGrandpa
· 8h ago
Buddy, can TAO break 1000 this round? I still have reservations; it depends on the market sentiment.
I actually think RENDER looks promising; GPU computing power is a real necessity in this track.
The price of NEAR feels overvalued; public chains are too competitive.
M87 is the real gambler's play; playing with small money is fine, going all-in is crazy.
I haven't followed FET; does anyone recommend it?
---
Everyone's hyping it up quite a bit, but how many projects are actually practical? Doing honest research is the key.
---
Aren't we all talking about the AI boom? Why do these projects all seem so disappointing?
---
Honestly, the demand for RENDER is real; it's much more substantial than those purely hype-driven coins.
---
Wait, where do these predictions come from? Are they from official sources or just community hype?
---
If you have plenty of money, go all-in on TAO; if not, play small-cap coins and take a gamble. The logic is that simple.
---
I just want to know who has really invested money into these projects, or if everyone is just talking about them on paper.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalist
· 8h ago
TAO冲1000 dollars? Just thinking about it is ridiculous. Let's first stabilize our current position.
I actually like RENDER. GPU rendering definitely has potential, just worried about overhype.
For coins like M87, reaching 0.1 is already good enough. Don't think too much.
FET and PAAL seem like follow-the-trend concepts. How many people are actually using them?
Actually, these predictions are just for listening. Who can really hit the mark precisely...
NEAR is worth paying attention to, but a target price of 12 dollars is too casual.
AI coins this year? Well... it depends on the market sentiment. Better to do more research.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 8h ago
1000 tokens of TAO? Dream on, it's better to go all in on RENDER, the GPU part is the real necessity.
---
NEAR is about to cut another wave of leeks, I've seen through it long ago.
---
FET five dollars? Bro, you're joking. When will that happen?
---
M87 reaching 0.1? I'd rather eat shit. Pure hype.
---
Basically, it's betting on the AI trend, but the real profit comes from early adopters. Now entering is basically just buying the dip.
---
RENDER is okay, others are all hype.
---
Where does this prediction come from? Feels like overthinking.
---
Opportunity? The risk is even greater. Just waiting for the next round of sell-offs.
---
That group of TAO people keep hyping, they'll blow up sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 8h ago
I only pay attention to projects with actual computing power support. I'm already tired of pure hype like TAO.
---
RENDER does have some substance, but the GPU market is now extremely competitive. Don't be brainwashed by marketing.
---
As for the price prediction of NEAR... emm, just listen and forget it. The public chain track is overcrowded to death.
---
Instead of staring at these altcoins, it's better to research real application implementations. Otherwise, you're just a bagholder.
---
2026 New Year? Let's first look at the macro situation next year. If the market sentiment shifts, everything could turn cold.
---
M87 aiming for $0.1... that's a bit outrageous. New projects like this carry huge risks.
---
FET has already had a hype cycle. Those jumping in now will have to cut losses. Trust me, I'm right.
---
Honestly, these predictions are all based on optimistic assumptions. The ones who really make money are always those who have already laid their traps.
---
I actually have a bit of a crush on RENDER, but I'm worried Nvidia will step in and kill the entire track.
---
Good prospects, but a coin that can multiply tenfold also carries ten times the risk. The choice is in your hands.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 8h ago
TAO hitting 1000 dollars? Come on, this round is just the manipulators hyping it up again.
I actually believe RENDER, GPU demand is right here.
For new coins like M87, it's worth a gamble, just don't go all in.
It's all about betting whether AI will really take off.
FET feels forgotten, which is a bit of a pity.
NEAR is stable, but can it keep up with the gains? It depends on the overall market.
Ultimately, it still depends on who can survive until the end of 2026.
This wave will either make big profits or suffer heavy losses, with no middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 8h ago
Oh no, more of these predictions. Will TAO break a thousand? I always feel it's a bit虚 (vague/uncertain).
It seems like everyone's just hyping concepts. Will RENDER be another round of cutting leeks?
I’m optimistic about NEAR and FET, but honestly, these price targets are a bit overly optimistic.
M87 is only $0.1, so it's better to be cautious with new coins.
Honestly, this AI cycle really depends on who can survive until the next bull market; everything else is nonsense.
If TAO really hits a thousand, I’ll just vomit. I’m still watching for now.
All these should be diversified risks; going all-in on one coin is just asking for death.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 8h ago
No nonsense, TAO this wave indeed has imagination, but can it reach $1000? It depends on whether there is real application support later on.
M87 dares to discuss even at 0.1, this wave of retail investors is indeed large.
RENDER I think is more reliable; GPU rendering is a necessity, unlike some coins that just tell stories.
Honestly, there are only a few projects that can survive this round; don’t put all your bets on concept coins.
How about FET? Feels like I haven't heard news about this coin in a long time.
Relying on price prediction alone is less reliable; tracking on-chain data yourself is more trustworthy.
Is AI really here this time, or is it just another hype cycle? Time will tell.
NEAR claims to be efficient, but the ecosystem is still too cold.
Doing this job is a gamble; if you bet right, you eat well; if you bet wrong, you eat dirt. Without deep research, nothing can save you.
Will 2026 be the year of AI concept coins? Many investors are betting on the growth potential of several popular tokens. From a technological application perspective, TAO is expected to break through $1000, RENDER is anticipated to rise to $15 thanks to GPU rendering capabilities, NEAR aims for a target price of $12 as an efficient public chain, and AI concept coins like FET and PAAL are also optimistic about reaching the $5 mark. Additionally, there is discussion about whether emerging projects like M87 can reach $0.1. These predictions reflect the market's confidence in the long-term prospects of the AI track. Which project do you think is more promising? Opportunities and risks coexist in this AI cycle; choosing a path depends on individual risk preferences and research depth.