JPMorgan's CFO Jeremy Barnum recently weighed in on a proposed legislative measure that would cap credit card APRs at 10% over a one-year period. His take? Pretty stark.
"You'd see credit access shrink dramatically—and I mean really dramatically," he pointed out. "The people hit hardest would be those who can least afford it."
The underlying concern here revolves around how rate caps function in lending markets. Restrict yields on high-risk borrowers, and lenders simply tighten underwriting or exit segments altogether. It's not malice; it's math. When the economics don't work, capital flows elsewhere.
This regulatory tension mirrors broader debates in crypto and fintech spaces, where policymakers often grapple with balancing consumer protection against market accessibility. The JPMorgan commentary underscores how structural financial interventions can have unintended consequences—especially for underserved populations who depend on credit for essential needs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaReckt
· 5h ago
JPMorgan is criticizing again. Is the interest rate cap really that scary? It feels like they're just protecting their huge profits.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 5h ago
It's the same old excuse again: when banks cut interest rates, it's the poor who suffer. But when they make huge profits, do they ever think about that? Truly unbelievable...
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 5h ago
Another "protect the poor" policy, but it ends up cutting off the poor's lifesaving money... This kind of logic is just as bad in traditional finance and the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 5h ago
Here we go again with this approach? Limiting APR can protect the poor, but it ends up pushing people out of the market... Policy makers will never understand what a counterforce is.
JPMorgan's CFO Jeremy Barnum recently weighed in on a proposed legislative measure that would cap credit card APRs at 10% over a one-year period. His take? Pretty stark.
"You'd see credit access shrink dramatically—and I mean really dramatically," he pointed out. "The people hit hardest would be those who can least afford it."
The underlying concern here revolves around how rate caps function in lending markets. Restrict yields on high-risk borrowers, and lenders simply tighten underwriting or exit segments altogether. It's not malice; it's math. When the economics don't work, capital flows elsewhere.
This regulatory tension mirrors broader debates in crypto and fintech spaces, where policymakers often grapple with balancing consumer protection against market accessibility. The JPMorgan commentary underscores how structural financial interventions can have unintended consequences—especially for underserved populations who depend on credit for essential needs.