Here's something worth questioning: do these AI bot projects actually own the underlying technology? The answer's often no—they're just operators. Yet here's the catch: even without ownership, these bots keep running and generating activity. So why does the market look so quiet? If the infrastructure stays operational but engagement tanks, it suggests deeper issues beyond just tech ownership. The real problem might be elsewhere—positioning, utility, or simply lack of genuine demand. Something to think about when evaluating these kinds of projects.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TheShibaWhisperervip
· 7h ago
This is a direct hit, the favorite tactic of shell operators. Projects with real demand won't be so quiet.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 7h ago
Ha, it's that same story of "we have technology" again, but in reality, nothing is actually true.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 8h ago
nah fr the real tell is when volume dries up but nodes keep humming... that's when you know it's just theater
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt