As traditional Play-to-Earn platforms evolve, the gaming sector is reshaping how creators and players interact with Web3 economies.
New approaches are emerging: build immersive 3D gaming experiences directly on-chain, launch your game as a tokenized asset, and capture value from every transaction. It's a shift from passive earning to active participation in the gaming economy.
The mechanics are straightforward—developers get toolkit access, players earn through gameplay participation, and native tokens consolidate ecosystem value. This model aligns incentives: creators benefit from sustained engagement, while token holders capture upside from network growth.
For those watching the gaming infrastructure space, this represents one of several experiment-stage approaches to sustainable GameFi models.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGoblin
· 7h ago
Nah, this tokenized asset approach still sounds like a repeat of the old tune. How many GameFi projects can truly survive?
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 7h ago
NGL GameFi, is this round going to hype up again? It just feels like a different way of saying the same thing.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 7h ago
The GameFi space is still constantly experimenting; how many successful models have actually been implemented?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 7h ago
Laughing and then crying, it's another "sustainable" GameFi model. I've heard this term too many times.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 7h ago
NGL, GameFi still depends on whether it can truly retain players in the long run, otherwise it's just another round of harvesting profits from early adopters.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 8h ago
Honestly, fully bringing games onto the blockchain sounds great, but will the gas fees just scare players away?
Tokenized game assets? I see more of a capital game.
This wave of GameFi is just cycling again, it feels no different in essence from previous P2E, just a different way of saying it.
To put it nicely, it's really just trying to scalp profits from every transaction.
Can this model really last long-term? Or is it just another preview of a new round of rug pulls...
Developers and token holders make easy money, while players end up as laborers—this logic is a bit twisted.
It's again "experiment-stage," which means it hasn't been successfully implemented yet.
As traditional Play-to-Earn platforms evolve, the gaming sector is reshaping how creators and players interact with Web3 economies.
New approaches are emerging: build immersive 3D gaming experiences directly on-chain, launch your game as a tokenized asset, and capture value from every transaction. It's a shift from passive earning to active participation in the gaming economy.
The mechanics are straightforward—developers get toolkit access, players earn through gameplay participation, and native tokens consolidate ecosystem value. This model aligns incentives: creators benefit from sustained engagement, while token holders capture upside from network growth.
For those watching the gaming infrastructure space, this represents one of several experiment-stage approaches to sustainable GameFi models.