When it comes to BGT, you're basically looking at three paths:



Keep staking and ride it out—stay locked in, accumulate rewards, but you're also locked in governance.

Or swap your BGT for BERA at 1:1—get out clean, but you lose all voting power permanently.

Then there's the middle ground: convert to an LST like iBGT and keep some exposure without the governance strings attached.

Each move has its trade-offs. Exit liquidity vs. governance weight vs. yield exposure. Pick your poison.
BERA-9,89%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SillyWhalevip
· 4h ago
Honestly, continuing to lock up assets is the right way, abandoning that wave was a huge loss.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 4h ago
Stick with governance or just replace it—this three-way choice is really hard to decide.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 4h ago
What is this... Isn't this just a forced binary choice game? If you really want to retain governance rights, you have to be locked out; if you want to cash out, you have to kneel and admit defeat. There's no such thing as a win-win situation.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezervip
· 5h ago
Hey, none of these three options are perfect; it feels like we're just forced to choose.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 5h ago
Seeing the three-way choice situation, the current question is which pit is the shallowest... --- Why keep locking up tokens? Without governance rights, what’s the point of governance? --- Honestly, liquidity is the most attractive. Exchanging for BERA 1:1 is really straightforward. --- The intermediate plan for iBGT sounds good, but I’m not sure how it will work in practice. --- This multiple-choice question is tough; each option involves a painful trade-off... --- What era are we in that governance is still needed? Isn’t it better to just preserve the principal?
View OriginalReply0
ContractHuntervip
· 5h ago
NGL, continuing to stake is really a gamble. It's locked in, but the returns are decent. It all depends on whether you trust the project team.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 5h ago
Just keep holding without moving, no need to overthink. Anyway, governance is not even needed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)