A few days ago, I shared my views on the 2.0 version of a certain project. Community feedback was mixed, but the facts verified the accuracy of the opinion. The latest development is that the project team has all exited after unsuccessful negotiations with the community, and the current stage has shifted to a purely community-driven management model. Interestingly, large holders' funds have started to enter the 2.0 camp.

From a personal perspective, I currently hold 80,000 tokens of this project. Comparing the versions, although the community's enthusiasm for 2.0 is still in the accumulation phase, from a fundamental analysis, indicators such as token burn scale and financial sustainability have already surpassed the initial version. This shows that the project has put effort into iteration.

However, a risk warning must be mentioned: among active traders on certain social platforms, some repeatedly manipulate similar projects—when hype is insufficient, they dump, then immediately launch a new project. It’s best for players not to follow this routine, as it’s easy to get caught at high positions. That’s how the market is—opportunities and traps are often just a layer of window paper apart.