2026-01-15 21:02:12

Solana's transaction processing architecture would benefit significantly from a unified scheduler. Right now, the network lacks a cohesive approach to ordering and executing transactions, which creates inefficiencies and limits throughput potential. A proper scheduling layer could dramatically improve consistency, reduce conflicts, and allow Solana to better compete with other high-performance blockchains. This is one of the critical infrastructure upgrades the ecosystem needs to tackle.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleDreamer

· 4h ago

Unified scheduler sounds good, but Solana's patching over the years still only treats the symptoms and doesn't address the root cause.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 4h ago

Basically, the scheduling mechanism of SOL is still too weak. The chaotic execution order makes it difficult to compare with ETH... We really need to implement a unified scheduler as soon as possible, or else the performance ceiling will remain here.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 5h ago

Basically, Solana's current scheduler is no different from having none at all; it's extremely congested.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 5h ago

Here comes the hype about SOL's infrastructure again. I just want to ask—if the scheduler is fixed, can transaction conflicts really disappear? I was this optimistic before going all-in that time, and as a result, I was liquidated to the point of doubting life. If only I had known earlier, optimizing infrastructure and keeping up with market liquidity are two completely different things; borrowing rates will only be higher.

View OriginalReply0