The leading effect has never been absent in the crypto market. As long as a leader emerges, follow-up projects will inevitably flock in.
Observing the current market, leading projects form barriers with their huge scale, occupying an absolute advantage with market caps often reaching hundreds of millions. While the second-tier camp is numerous, the performance of these projects varies greatly—some are striving hard to catch up, while others are stumbling along.
This phenomenon actually reflects a rule in the cryptocurrency ecosystem: leading projects have a natural siphon effect. Whether it’s capital flow or attention, it tends to concentrate on the top projects. Second-tier and subsequent projects need to find differentiated value propositions to break through, rather than simply following the trend. The market is proving a simple truth through action—whether a project has hardcore competitiveness will ultimately be decided by the price.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UncleLiquidation
· 5h ago
Leading projects just siphon off the market; most followers are cannon fodder.
Is there any profit in following the trend? Dream on.
Differentiation is the way to survive; copying and pasting only leads to death.
This round, it all depends on who can truly innovate something different.
Second-tier projects want to break through? No way.
Funds don't care about you, and your attention is zero.
Projects with strength will speak for themselves; if you have nothing, stop crying out loud.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 5h ago
Leading companies siphon the meat, second-tier ones drink the soup, it's that simple.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 5h ago
Leading projects are stuck in a rut; no matter how you try with small coins, it's all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSage
· 5h ago
The leading players eat the meat, Long Er drinks the soup. This set of gameplay is still the same old routine. When will it finally break through?
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher
· 5h ago
The leader is the leader, everything else is just a supporting role—brutal but real.
The leading effect has never been absent in the crypto market. As long as a leader emerges, follow-up projects will inevitably flock in.
Observing the current market, leading projects form barriers with their huge scale, occupying an absolute advantage with market caps often reaching hundreds of millions. While the second-tier camp is numerous, the performance of these projects varies greatly—some are striving hard to catch up, while others are stumbling along.
This phenomenon actually reflects a rule in the cryptocurrency ecosystem: leading projects have a natural siphon effect. Whether it’s capital flow or attention, it tends to concentrate on the top projects. Second-tier and subsequent projects need to find differentiated value propositions to break through, rather than simply following the trend. The market is proving a simple truth through action—whether a project has hardcore competitiveness will ultimately be decided by the price.