2026-01-15 21:22:29

There is an interesting opportunity on Pendle — you can lock in a fixed APY of 10-14% within 160 days by choosing PT-reUSD or PT-reUSDe.

reUSD is a product worth considering. It is an interest-bearing asset backed by a delta-neutral strategy involving US bonds and ETH, with a baseline APY stable between 6%-8%, without the hassle of insurance risks, and liquidity remains real-time.

reUSDe further optimizes this. Combining Pendle's Principal Token mechanism, you can lock in higher yields — 10-14% during this 160-day cycle. Compared to the current DeFi market, this is indeed attractive.

The key point is that time is limited; such fixed-income windows are usually not open for long. If you're looking for a stable yet higher-yield channel beyond mainstream lending platforms, this might be worth paying attention to.

ETH-0,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 9h ago

160 days 10-14%? This return is indeed tempting, but is reUSDe's delta-neutral strategy really reliable?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 9h ago

160 days lock-in 10-14%, this wave is indeed quite impressive, much more attractive than mainstream lending platforms.

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 9h ago

10-14%? Bro, isn't this just a bottom-fishing signal? Go all-in, lock in profits for 160 days, and it's guaranteed.

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 9h ago

Damn, locking for 160 days at 10-14%, this yield is really aggressive. --- The backing of US bonds plus ETH hedging behind reUSD, this combination is quite stable. Not having an insurance cushion is also a plus. --- I'm just worried this window closes quickly. Opportunities like Pendle are always fleeting. --- Is it really worth messing around with the few extra points that PT-reUSDe has over reUSD? --- In the current DeFi environment, fixed yields of 10%+ are indeed rare. Missing out would be a bit regrettable. --- The key is how long the delta-neutral strategy can hold up, but in the short term, it's not a big issue. --- The 160-day cycle is just right; it doesn't involve overly long commitments. I actually like that. --- The real-time liquidity aspect is very attractive to me; no worries about not being able to exit when I want. --- I'm a bit tempted but also cautious. After all, there's always something I haven't fully understood behind high yields.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 9h ago

okay so reUSD backed by treasuries + ETH delta neutral... that's lowkey the most "i'm tired of aping into ponzis" move i've seen in a minute, ngl the 10-14% APY math checks out but does anyone actually trust a 160-day window or is this just another liquidity migration psyop 🤔

Reply0

FastLeaver

· 9h ago

160 days lock-in 10-14%? Sounds good but still a bit cautious, not daring to go all in --- The behind reUSD is US debt plus ETH neutral arbitrage, I can accept this logic --- Limited window period, I've heard this explanation too many times... but indeed, it's worth taking a look --- Pendle's recent operations are still somewhat impressive, much better than those trash loans --- The question is, what to do after 160 days, the gains are gone? --- 10-14% is quite good in this bear market environment, just worried about a sudden crash --- US debt support sounds stable, but DeFi is never absolutely safe, don’t be fooled --- Limited time window = prelude to harvesting profits, old trick --- The design idea of reUSDe is understandable, but who dares to guarantee the risk part?

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 9h ago

160 days 10-14%? This return rate is indeed eye-catching in this market, but I still want to ask, how does the delta-neutral strategy behind reUSDe actually ensure stability?

View OriginalReply0