InfoFi's rewards mechanism just shifted gears. Testnet participants and builders are now the main beneficiaries. But here's the real question—who else is actually getting a slice? The transparency around the new reward distribution deserves some serious scrutiny. Is this reallocation making sense for ecosystem growth, or are some stakeholders left out in the cold?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaser
· 21h ago
Transparency has always been a weakness; it feels like we're just bleeding developers, and regular players are getting cut again.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 21h ago
The transparency isn't enough. This round of reward redistribution feels like it's giving a blood transfusion to early participants. What about the rest of the ecosystem?
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 21h ago
It's the same old trick again—first giving developers a sweet deal, what about regular users?
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 21h ago
It's the same group of people on the testnet eating the meat, retail investors just get the soup... The transparency aspect definitely needs to be thoroughly examined.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 21h ago
What about transparency? It feels like the same old story—whitelisted folks are well-fed while others are just getting the leftovers.
InfoFi's rewards mechanism just shifted gears. Testnet participants and builders are now the main beneficiaries. But here's the real question—who else is actually getting a slice? The transparency around the new reward distribution deserves some serious scrutiny. Is this reallocation making sense for ecosystem growth, or are some stakeholders left out in the cold?