InfoFi's rewards mechanism just shifted gears. Testnet participants and builders are now the main beneficiaries. But here's the real question—who else is actually getting a slice? The transparency around the new reward distribution deserves some serious scrutiny. Is this reallocation making sense for ecosystem growth, or are some stakeholders left out in the cold?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaservip
· 21h ago
Transparency has always been a weakness; it feels like we're just bleeding developers, and regular players are getting cut again.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 21h ago
The transparency isn't enough. This round of reward redistribution feels like it's giving a blood transfusion to early participants. What about the rest of the ecosystem?
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 21h ago
It's the same old trick again—first giving developers a sweet deal, what about regular users?
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistancevip
· 21h ago
It's the same group of people on the testnet eating the meat, retail investors just get the soup... The transparency aspect definitely needs to be thoroughly examined.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000vip
· 21h ago
What about transparency? It feels like the same old story—whitelisted folks are well-fed while others are just getting the leftovers.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)