A prominent crypto leader recently laid out his position without mincing words: this particular bill would actually leave crypto in a worse spot than where things stand right now. And frankly, passing nothing beats passing something flawed.
It's not that regulation itself is the enemy here. The real problem? The draft leans heavily toward protecting the existing banking establishment over fostering genuine innovation in crypto. That imbalance is why some in the industry see it as a step backward rather than forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDoctrine
· 8h ago
Rather than passing a bad bill, it's better to do nothing at all. This guy's statement is pretty decisive.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 11h ago
Rather than passing bad legislation, it's better to do nothing... I agree with this statement. It's really just about protecting the old banking system. What about innovation?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 11h ago
I'd rather do nothing than pass bad legislation, I agree with that.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 11h ago
It's better to say "rules" than to say "fucking chokehold." Protecting the old banking system and still wanting to innovate— isn't that funny?
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 11h ago
It's better to do nothing than pass bad legislation. There's nothing wrong with that.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 12h ago
Instead of passing a bill that shoots itself in the foot, it's better to do nothing at all. The old banking aristocrats' moat has been reinforced, and our space for innovation is actually being squeezed... This is just ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 12h ago
Damn, it's another bill that helps the banking elites speak up for themselves. Isn't this just a disguise to continue ripping us off?
A prominent crypto leader recently laid out his position without mincing words: this particular bill would actually leave crypto in a worse spot than where things stand right now. And frankly, passing nothing beats passing something flawed.
It's not that regulation itself is the enemy here. The real problem? The draft leans heavily toward protecting the existing banking establishment over fostering genuine innovation in crypto. That imbalance is why some in the industry see it as a step backward rather than forward.