2026-01-15 21:28:08

The market game triggered by a certain popular project is worth reviewing. The project team is well aware of the enormous future market cap potential of this ticker, but chose a more cautious strategy—supporting related layouts on their own platform while subtly hinting at some connection with a leading exchange. The community then stepped up to voice their concerns, publicly questioning the underlying logic chain. Interestingly, this "hidden war" ultimately brought a lot of exposure and attention to that top exchange. Such events reflect the subtle game among various participants in the Web3 market—each seemingly simple action may hide a redistribution of traffic and trust behind the scenes. How it will ultimately end remains to be seen, and time will tell.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationSurvivor

· 5h ago

Ah, it's the same old trick again. The exchange makes a fortune, and the community keeps blaming each other.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 18h ago

It's the same old routine of "hint-question-expose" again, getting a bit tired of it.

View OriginalReply0

HallucinationGrower

· 18h ago

It's the same old game of mutual hints again; the crypto world is just that boring.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 18h ago

Really, I've seen this routine too many times. The project teams, exchanges, and communities each operate independently, and in the end, the ones who make money are those who know how to play.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 18h ago

Basically, this scheme is just everyone scamming each other—project teams pretending to be innocent, exchanges acting innocent, and the community crying foul—all without anyone actually losing out.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 18h ago

According to on-chain data, the tactical shifts of these project teams typically trigger TVL fluctuations of 15-23% within 7 days, which is worth monitoring. --- In simple terms, all parties are competing for the right to speak. It is indeed rational for project teams to choose their own ecosystems, but community skepticism is also understandable — this is the norm in Web3. --- Interestingly, the ones who ultimately benefit are actually the exchanges' liquidity pools... This logical chain is worth dissecting from three different perspectives. --- Dark battles? Not really, it's just a reorganization of interests to meet each other's needs. The key is whether the subsequent smart contract design can support these expectations. --- Based on historical case data, similar "cautious strategies" often indicate larger plans — time will tell, but it's too early to draw conclusions now.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 19h ago

Hmm... I've seen this trick too many times, and in the end, the winners are still those big exchanges.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 19h ago

Really, using this routine for so many years and still going strong is just ridiculous. What is the project team pretending to do? Honestly, it's just for cutting the leeks. --- Dark battles? Wake up, it's all surface-level talk. Everyone is just thinking about their own gains. --- Is that all? I thought there would be some new tricks, but it’s still the same old traffic game. --- Wait, so who actually won? Or did everyone just make money? --- This is Web3. In name only decentralized, but in reality, major platforms are secretly colluding with each other. --- Laughing to death, the final profits still go to those top exchanges, retail investors just keep being the leeks. --- Interesting, at least there are still some communities willing to openly question, showing a bit of idealism. --- Will time give the answer? Bro, the market has already given the answer; all the money is in their hands.

View OriginalReply0