When hackers came knocking with ransom demands, Odyssey didn't pay a dime. Why? Because smart architecture beats extortion every time. It raises a fair question: how many other platforms can claim they built defenses strong enough to dodge these threats without bleeding money? Most superapps would've folded under pressure. This one chose to think first.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Anon32942
· 6h ago
Refusing hacker ransom and still living well—this is true real strength.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 6h ago
Speaking of Odyssey's recent move, it's really bold—directly confronting hackers without paying, which is rare in the industry.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 6h ago
Wow, you really didn't pay the ransom? This architecture is so solid... Most projects would have given up long ago.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 6h ago
Damn, finally there's a platform that hackers can't dominate. Most projects have already obediently paid up.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 6h ago
Stay calm, this is the proper safety architecture concept, not some money-spending safety measure.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 6h ago
Projects that don't get buy-in are indeed rare; most have already paid up... This architectural idea is quite solid.
When hackers came knocking with ransom demands, Odyssey didn't pay a dime. Why? Because smart architecture beats extortion every time. It raises a fair question: how many other platforms can claim they built defenses strong enough to dodge these threats without bleeding money? Most superapps would've folded under pressure. This one chose to think first.