2026-01-15 21:40:23

You'd never catch certain historical topics gaining any real traction on mainstream social platforms these days. The algorithms and content policies have gotten so strict that whole swaths of historical discussion just get buried or throttled. It's an interesting question about what actually gets amplified versus what stays invisible in the feed.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SocialFiQueen

· 8h ago

Algorithms are just like dice; the amount of history filtered out is probably greater than what has been passed down.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 12h ago

Algorithm dictatorship, even history has to kneel... These days, everything can be buried; if you're unhappy, you just disappear from the feed.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerMiner

· 12h ago

Algorithm review is really outrageous. Certain historical topics are suppressed as soon as they are mentioned, and there's no opportunity for discussion. The feed always shows only the "allowed" content, and everything else has disappeared.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 12h ago

the feed's just running a massive clustering algorithm at this point—certain narratives get whale'd into visibility while others get liquidated before anyone notices. pattern's been there since day one tbh, it's just the statistical significance hitting different now

Reply0

SerRugResistant

· 12h ago

Algorithms are really good at scrutiny; if you dare to mess with them, you'll sink immediately.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 12h ago

Algorithm review is really outrageous. Some historical topics just can't get on the trending list no matter what. The platform says it's for "safety," but it's actually just censorship of speech.

View OriginalReply0