2026-01-15 21:49:01

How strict are the standards for launching Web3 applications? The data tells you the answer.

Mobile pipeline configuration: supported by 3 technical capabilities, with over 70 rules constraints, accounting for 10% of Ralph's score.

Web pipeline configuration: also supported by 3 technical capabilities, but the number of rules has surged to over 145, accounting for 45% of Ralph's score.

What does this mean? The compliance requirements for Web3 applications are far higher than those for mobile. To go live, each application must meet a compliance score threshold of over 95%, with not a single point missed. The logic behind this system is clear: as the Web3 ecosystem becomes more mature, market expectations for product quality are also rising. The more rules there are, the more meticulous the risk control, and the more comprehensive the user protection.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MissedTheBoat

· 5h ago

Ah, these 145 rules? Web3 is really getting more competitive, the entry barrier is being raised to the max.

View OriginalReply0

SelfRugger

· 5h ago

145 rules? Now that's true strict guarding. It feels like launching Web3 is even harder than climbing to the sky.

View OriginalReply0

StillBuyingTheDip

· 5h ago

Damn, 145 rules? Web3 is really moving towards standardization, and this increase in thresholds is pretty intense. --- So only those with a score above 95 can go live. Our small projects will have to go through the process again. --- Compliance scores jumped from 10% to 45%. It seems that regulators are really holding on tight to Web3. --- Rather than risk prevention, it's more like indirectly restricting small teams. --- That said, the rules are rigid, but at least users can feel more secure. This trade-off is somewhat fair.

View OriginalReply0