2026-01-15 21:57:51

FOMO has built a decentralized AI model launch platform, with the core idea of enabling any developer to publish their own AI models, while users can directly incentivize creators through cryptocurrency.

The platform adopts a franchise economic model, combined with a token buyback and burn mechanism to support the token's value, and encourages user participation in model inference through staking subsidies. To reduce integration costs for developers, the platform also offers API discounts. In terms of ecosystem, FOMO has connected with AI Arena (model training) and FL Alliance (distributed computing power), forming a complete AI development and deployment chain.

Since its mainnet launch in 2024, the platform has aggregated over 10,000 models and attracted more than 56,000 $FLOCK token holders to participate. This model breaks the traditional centralized operation of AI services, allowing computing power and creativity to be traded directly.

FLOCK-0,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSunnyDay

· 44m ago

Another AI concept project, let's see how long it can last --- Decentralization sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another scam to cut the leeks --- 10,000 models? Need to ask how many are actually active --- Direct incentives for creators are okay, but the tokenomics need to see how it performs later --- Staking subsidies... I've heard this story too many times --- Mining power trading is interesting, but there are quite a few competitors too --- $FLOCK holders are only 56,000? Still feels too niche --- Connecting AI Arena and distributed computing power is good, but it only counts if it can really take off --- Buyback and burn mechanism is basically old news; how long it can last is a question --- The biggest risk with this kind of thing is lack of liquidity. Hope it doesn't become the next worthless coin --- Ehhh, will developers really come, or is it just capital hype again

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-15 22:27

It's the same old story of buyback and burn. How much does the gas fee cost? After calculating for a long time late at night, participating in staking subsidies isn't even as cost-effective as saving on gas.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-15 22:20

This mode sounds pretty good, but can it really attract that many developers to contribute continuously? --- 10,000 models sound impressive, but what about their quality? Are most of them garbage? --- It's both franchising and buyback destruction. This routine feels a bit familiar. --- Directly incentivize creators with tokens? That's what Web3 should be doing. --- Staking subsidies can indeed attract people, but I'm worried that the subsidy support might not keep up later. --- No, the 56,000 holders number seems a bit inflated. It depends on the actual active users. --- How is the collaboration with AI Arena? Are there any real projects landing? --- Decentralization sounds great, but the technical implementation difficulty is probably not small.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-15 22:18

Wow, over 100,000 models? The growth rate is a bit outrageous. --- Staking subsidies are real, but I'm just worried it might turn into a game of hot potato later on. --- Directly incentivizing creators is good, but how long the token economy can sustain is the key. --- The story of decentralized AI is back again, year after year, the flowers look similar... --- 56,000 holders sounds like a lot, but how many are actually using it? --- API discounts are indeed clever, lowering the barrier to entry. --- The ecological closed-loop looks perfect, but it depends on whether it can run smoothly. --- Another buyback and burn, this tactic is getting old. --- Hundreds of thousands of models piled up there, quality varies greatly. --- This is the way AI should be, let creativity flow.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 01-15 22:13

Amazing, directly incentivizing creators is finally being tried by someone. Wait, how useful are 10,000 models really? It's a combination of buyback and burn, as well as staking subsidies. How long can this combo last? Directly trading computing power sounds great, but I'm worried it will turn into another capital game.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-15 22:11

Is this thing really reliable? Feels like just a bunch of concepts piled together --- 10,000 models sound like a lot, but who knows how active they are --- Directly incentivizing creators still has some room for imagination --- Staking subsidies are back again, this routine has been seen too many times --- By the way, can it really form a closed loop? It still depends on subsequent execution --- Direct trading of computing power and creativity? The prerequisite is having real demand --- 56,000 holders of the coin, this scale is not too small but not too large either --- API discounts sound good, but I’m worried about various charges appearing later --- Tired of the decentralization talk, the key is whether it can avoid being exploited --- The buyback and burn mechanism needs long-term observation to see how long it can last

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader

· 01-15 22:08

Wow, the decentralized AI platform is really here. Creators can now directly earn money. Is the number of 10,000 models real or just hype? Staking subsidies sound good, but that buyback and burn mechanism feels a bit familiar. Direct trading of computing power—if it gets implemented well, the landscape will change. There are over 56,000 token holders, which still feels a bit low. The name FOMO is really clever.

View OriginalReply0