The main theme of this market cycle may finally be emerging—the combination of tax tokens with X.
Breaking it down, X performs very differently across various public blockchains. In the Solana ecosystem, X focuses on AI, Vibecoding, and RWA; on BNB Chain, it’s about grassroots marketing and deep community engagement.
I’ve basically figured out these strategies. Looking back: the wave of Launchcoin in early March, the story of Koma earlier, and recently seeing Giggle repeat this approach. If this cycle is just a replica of the last one, then the ceiling is definitely limited.
The core issue boils down to one point—X must truly create differentiation. Merely copying previous models, no matter how well packaged, cannot sustain high levels. The key is whether X can achieve a substantial breakthrough, otherwise the potential for this cycle’s growth will be firmly limited.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinja
· 11h ago
Tax coin + X, this combination sounds like an old trick with a new coat of paint
Another round of Launchcoin déjà vu? It's about time to wake up
If X doesn't truly break through, it's just a fancy re-zero machine
On Solana, AI, RWA, Vibecoding are getting heated; BNB is pushing community locally. Where's the differentiation?
Honestly, it's still about whether X can tell a new story; otherwise, it's just a parrot.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 11h ago
It's the same old routine of tax tokens paired with X, let's see what new tricks can be played.
---
On Solana, they promote AI and RWA, BNB pushes community locally, they've gone through about three rounds of this pattern—can they innovate further?
---
Honestly, it all depends on whether X can really come up with something different; otherwise, the ceiling has already been set.
---
Launchcoin, Koma, Giggle... this cycle is getting a bit boring. Can they really break through?
---
Copy-pasting even the most beautiful skins can't withstand the real innovation; we still need substantial breakthroughs.
---
If this is just a rehash, I guess the hype won't last more than two weeks.
---
I agree that the perceived limited imagination is a factor, but let's see how X responds.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 11h ago
actually, per my analysis of the token phylogenetics here—launchcoin → koma → giggle is just evolutionary dead-end territory. same skin, different skeleton. x won't moon unless it breaks the taxonomic pattern, statistically speaking.
Reply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 11h ago
Churning out the same old tricks again? Koma, Launchcoin, Giggle... I'm already tired of this routine.
Tax coin + X combo sounds good, but whether on Solana or BNB Chain, it's still the same old story. Without real value, you can't make money.
Good packaging doesn't mean you can fly; differentiation is the key. Now we're just waiting for X to deliver something substantial, or this round will be just average.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasis
· 12h ago
Bro is right, this routine has really been played out
It's just a different skin, but the story is still the same story
Wait, can Solana's AI angle really hold up?
Koma→Launchcoin→Giggle, all carved from the same mold
The key is whether X can produce some real stuff, or else we'll be at a loss again
Differentiation is the way out, otherwise it's just hype and deception
The main theme of this market cycle may finally be emerging—the combination of tax tokens with X.
Breaking it down, X performs very differently across various public blockchains. In the Solana ecosystem, X focuses on AI, Vibecoding, and RWA; on BNB Chain, it’s about grassroots marketing and deep community engagement.
I’ve basically figured out these strategies. Looking back: the wave of Launchcoin in early March, the story of Koma earlier, and recently seeing Giggle repeat this approach. If this cycle is just a replica of the last one, then the ceiling is definitely limited.
The core issue boils down to one point—X must truly create differentiation. Merely copying previous models, no matter how well packaged, cannot sustain high levels. The key is whether X can achieve a substantial breakthrough, otherwise the potential for this cycle’s growth will be firmly limited.