The competition in the stablecoin sector is becoming increasingly fierce. According to data tracking, the CASH stablecoin issued by Phantom Wallet has performed remarkably well—its supply volume jumped from approximately $25 million in September to nearly $100 million in just three months, an increase of about 4 times. In comparison, MetaMask's mUSD has performed much more poorly. This stablecoin briefly approached the $100 million mark in early October but then continued to decline and has now fallen to about $25 million, a drop of 75%. The stark contrast between the two products reflects a significant divergence in the adoption of stablecoins within the wallet ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeTokenGenius
· 10h ago
This round of Phantom is truly amazing, with CASH increasing fourfold, while MetaMask's mUSD plummeted by 75%. The difference is just too obvious.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larry
· 10h ago
Phantom really got it right this time; CASH increasing fourfold is no small feat.
MetaMask's mUSD has dropped to nothing; it's only been three months...
Wallet ecosystems are like this—whoever can retain users wins.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 10h ago
According to on-chain data, CASH's fourfold growth rate is indeed impressive, but what is the driving force behind this adoption? Is it purely wallet integration or genuine usage demand? It is worth a deeper analysis.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 10h ago
Phantom is really fierce this time, with CASH quadrupling and directly crushing mUSD. MetaMask had a failure this time.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 10h ago
Phantom is really going crazy this time, mUSD was cut in half, what's MetaMask doing?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 11h ago
Phantom's stablecoin game is really impressive; calling it a direct cut in mUSD by half doesn't do it justice...
---
MetaMask's recent mishap was quite intense; why is mUSD performing so poorly?
---
CASH quadrupling in growth? Phantom wallet ecosystem is truly top-notch.
---
That's why I still trust Phantom; seeing mUSD's 75% drop is painful.
---
The stablecoin race is heating up, and this trend is quite interesting.
---
Phantom CASH unexpectedly surged, MetaMask lagged behind—are the gaps this big?
---
Wallet ecosystem determines the fate of stablecoins? The logic might not be that simple.
---
A 75% drop... mUSD needs to figure out how to turn things around.
---
CASH grew from 25 million to 100 million; this growth rate is truly outrageous.
---
Really curious to see how MetaMask plans to recover next.
The competition in the stablecoin sector is becoming increasingly fierce. According to data tracking, the CASH stablecoin issued by Phantom Wallet has performed remarkably well—its supply volume jumped from approximately $25 million in September to nearly $100 million in just three months, an increase of about 4 times. In comparison, MetaMask's mUSD has performed much more poorly. This stablecoin briefly approached the $100 million mark in early October but then continued to decline and has now fallen to about $25 million, a drop of 75%. The stark contrast between the two products reflects a significant divergence in the adoption of stablecoins within the wallet ecosystem.