According to News1, South Korea's financial regulatory authorities are studying the possibility of restricting major shareholders' holdings in crypto asset exchanges to 15%–20%. In response, the academic community pointed out that this approach might infringe on property rights, pose constitutional risks, and be inconsistent with international practices. Instead of forcibly limiting shareholdings, a more feasible alternative is to strengthen the scrutiny of major shareholder eligibility, improve the board of directors and internal controls, and promote long-term IPO mechanisms, thereby ensuring responsible management while achieving fundraising and share dispersion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
According to News1, South Korea's financial regulatory authorities are studying the possibility of restricting major shareholders' holdings in crypto asset exchanges to 15%–20%. In response, the academic community pointed out that this approach might infringe on property rights, pose constitutional risks, and be inconsistent with international practices. Instead of forcibly limiting shareholdings, a more feasible alternative is to strengthen the scrutiny of major shareholder eligibility, improve the board of directors and internal controls, and promote long-term IPO mechanisms, thereby ensuring responsible management while achieving fundraising and share dispersion.