2026-01-16 09:23:20

Recently, I have been paying attention to the two tokens GUA and RIVER, and their trading performance is worth mentioning.

GUA's entry timing is good, and if you follow the recent market trend, the returns can be quite substantial. RIVER is even more interesting; its -1.5 fee structure significantly reduces trading costs. Given the current market trend, it is not uncommon to earn over $100 in an hour.

The market activity for these two tokens has been quite high recently. If you are a short-term trader, low-fee, high-liquidity assets like these are worth paying close attention to. Of course, any trading decision should be based on your risk tolerance and technical analysis, as the market can change rapidly.

How has your recent trading experience been? Are these two tokens your main focus?

GUA-3,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainWorker

· 8h ago

Negative fee rates always sound a bit suspicious. Can they really stabilize arbitrage? RIVER has surged so strongly, it's really tempting, but I still want to see how it develops later. I didn't catch GUA, missed a few waves, which is a bit unfortunate. Short-term trading is so刺激, one misstep and you could lose everything. Better to be cautious. Can the money saved on fees really double, or is this just a marketing gimmick? I'm currently watching these two coins. I always feel that risk and opportunity often go hand in hand. Earning a hundred dollars in an hour sounds great, but losing it can happen in minutes.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 9h ago

Negative fee rates sound tempting, but before diving in, you need to consider when liquidity might change face. Could RIVER be just the next air? I'm a bit hesitant to touch it. GUA does have some potential, but those chasing the high should be careful about getting cut. Neither of these will stay popular for too long; once the trend shifts, it's over. As long as the fees are attractive enough to dare to go all-in, I just can't understand that logic.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 9h ago

No-fee trading sounds a bit too good to be true. Can it really guarantee profits? I'm still watching the GUA move, afraid of getting caught in a trap. I'm optimistic about GUA, but short-term trading really depends on reaction speed. Making a hundred dollars in an hour sounds great, but what about the risk? You could also lose a hundred dollars in an hour. These two coins have been quite active recently, but I still think it's better to wait and not get caught by FOMO.

View OriginalReply0

NftRegretMachine

· 9h ago

Negative fee structures sound good, but I care more about liquidity depth... Are GUA and RIVER really stable? RIVER making hundreds of dollars in an hour sounds a bit too smooth; it depends on how deep the drawdown is. Short-term fee savings are good, but what about the risks... Have these two had any recent negative news? Can you make money by following GUA? When is "following" exactly? It's probably already too late. This fee structure feels like a trap... The cheaper the trading pair, the easier it is to get liquidated. Market conditions change rapidly, and you still recommend short-term trading?

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 9h ago

Negative fees are really tempting, but be careful not to get shorted and crushed --- Too many people are following GUA, it feels like it's about to end --- Making over 100 in an hour? You should verify the data yourself before trusting it --- The RIVER structure is indeed innovative, just not sure how the liquidity will look later --- I've heard too many stories of short-term explosive profits, but in the end, they all cut me in the opposite direction --- Which big brother has really made money using RIVER? Share your real trading experience --- The lower the fee rate, the more cautious you should be. I trust those established, stable projects more --- How is the activity level of these two coins judged? Is it trading volume or the number of holders? --- Every time I see these high-yield cases, I think of past lessons --- The risk warning is well written, but when you actually lose money, who still remembers it?

View OriginalReply0