On January 16th, the market opened with divergence as the A-shares rose driven by the weighty sectors, with the A50 index surging then pulling back; Hong Kong stocks also followed suit with adjustments, with the Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng Tech Index both declining collectively. This stands in stark contrast to the euphoria caused by the structural tool rate cut the night before.
It may seem like ordinary intraday volatility, but it reflects a deeper change—the market’s perception of the fundamentals is quietly shifting. The key to this adjustment isn’t the rise or fall of the indices themselves, but a change in the pricing logic. At least three important expectation lines have been recalibrated.
**First, let’s look at the liquidity line.** Recently, M1 data has shown a decline, prompting the market to ponder: does abundant money mean active money? In the latest financial data, the year-over-year growth rate of M2 is 8.5%, while M1 is only 3.8%, with the gap widening. What does this imply? It indicates that the willingness of enterprises and residents to hold demand deposits is weak; money is sitting in bank accounts and not flowing into transactions or investments. For credit expansion to effectively transmit to market trading activity, this link is stalled.
**Next, the policy pace line.** After the structural tool rate cut, some funds are recalculating the timing of a comprehensive rate cut. The central bank has explicitly announced that from January 19, it will lower the re-lending and re-discount rates by 0.25 percentage points, and adjust multiple structural tool rates. This move is more targeted and incentivizing, aiming to boost marginal enthusiasm for credit in key areas first. But it could also mean that the window for another large-scale rate cut before the holiday may not be as urgent.
**Finally, the profitability effect line.** Can the market’s recent enthusiasm for chasing gains continue? That depends on how the previous two lines evolve. If liquidity transmission cools off and policy pace doesn’t accelerate as expected, the strength of thematic stocks and hot spots will find it difficult to stay elevated.
In fact, the market is constantly adjusting these expectations in real time. Once expectations change, emotional fluctuations naturally follow.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeTillRetire
· 8h ago
Money lying still is the real problem
M1 is only 3.8%, who can withstand that? No wonder it dipped today
It's another targeted incentive, not a full-rate cut, no wonder funds are on the sidelines
Whether the index rises or falls is meaningless; the key is where the money flows
Once expectations change, sentiment explodes—this is the market
I've said it before, the pace isn't that fast, we still need to wait
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 8h ago
All the money is just sitting in the account, no wonder the market is dull.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 8h ago
Here it comes again. After the excitement, it's back to cognitive adjustment. This routine is completely rotten.
Money lying idle in accounts, how can there still be heat? Honestly, no one dares to move.
Targeted incentives? Ha, it's just not the time for a big liquidity injection yet. Hang in there, everyone.
The strength of the main theme stocks can't stay high forever. It's been obvious for a while. Those chasing the highs, get ready to be cut.
When the M1 and M2 scissors gap widens, I know it's game over. This wave is cooling off.
When expectations change, emotions drift. The market is always so cheap, nothing new.
The window for rate cuts before the holiday isn't that urgent? The implicit meaning is that we still have to wait. Don't dream, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 8h ago
Having money sitting in an account is a sign of permission control failure, and the flow of funds has been broken. This is similar to the reentrancy vulnerabilities I have reviewed—seemingly minor issues, but in fact, the entire system's transmission mechanism is jammed.
On January 16th, the market opened with divergence as the A-shares rose driven by the weighty sectors, with the A50 index surging then pulling back; Hong Kong stocks also followed suit with adjustments, with the Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng Tech Index both declining collectively. This stands in stark contrast to the euphoria caused by the structural tool rate cut the night before.
It may seem like ordinary intraday volatility, but it reflects a deeper change—the market’s perception of the fundamentals is quietly shifting. The key to this adjustment isn’t the rise or fall of the indices themselves, but a change in the pricing logic. At least three important expectation lines have been recalibrated.
**First, let’s look at the liquidity line.** Recently, M1 data has shown a decline, prompting the market to ponder: does abundant money mean active money? In the latest financial data, the year-over-year growth rate of M2 is 8.5%, while M1 is only 3.8%, with the gap widening. What does this imply? It indicates that the willingness of enterprises and residents to hold demand deposits is weak; money is sitting in bank accounts and not flowing into transactions or investments. For credit expansion to effectively transmit to market trading activity, this link is stalled.
**Next, the policy pace line.** After the structural tool rate cut, some funds are recalculating the timing of a comprehensive rate cut. The central bank has explicitly announced that from January 19, it will lower the re-lending and re-discount rates by 0.25 percentage points, and adjust multiple structural tool rates. This move is more targeted and incentivizing, aiming to boost marginal enthusiasm for credit in key areas first. But it could also mean that the window for another large-scale rate cut before the holiday may not be as urgent.
**Finally, the profitability effect line.** Can the market’s recent enthusiasm for chasing gains continue? That depends on how the previous two lines evolve. If liquidity transmission cools off and policy pace doesn’t accelerate as expected, the strength of thematic stocks and hot spots will find it difficult to stay elevated.
In fact, the market is constantly adjusting these expectations in real time. Once expectations change, emotional fluctuations naturally follow.