2026-01-16 09:26:02

The USDT-USDC trading pair on the BNB Chain is worth paying attention to. These stablecoin pairs have ample liquidity and are popular tracks on DEX platforms. Supported by leading institutions, the project has a reasonable market cap and a solid ecological foundation. Its core appeal lies in the fee model—fees generated from transactions can be converted into platform points or tokens, effectively exchanging trading fees for ecological rights. This design not only attracts trading volume but also provides a defensive mechanism for long-term holders. Stablecoin pairs have low volatility and deep trading pairs, making them suitable for volume and arbitrage. Overall, this type of product combines popularity and sustainability.

BNB0,24%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProbablyNothing

· 1h ago

Arbitrage with stablecoins is indeed comfortable, but I've heard the same fee model explanation too many times. How many actually manage to execute it successfully?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 10h ago

Arbitrage with stablecoins sounds good, but I'm worried it's just paper gains... I've seen too many tricks where fees are converted into points, and in the end, they all fizzle out.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 10h ago

Arbitrage with stablecoin pairs is definitely feasible, and the rebate model for transaction fees is quite attractive. With such abundant liquidity on the BNB Chain, missing out feels like a loss. Fee-to-Points? I like this move; it's essentially free profit. The question is, how long can these types of projects sustain themselves before losing popularity? Deep liquidity on DEX for stablecoin pairs is suitable for someone like me who enjoys exploiting price differences. Having top-tier institutions backing it up means it probably won't perform too poorly. Ample liquidity is key; otherwise, slippage can cause serious issues. This kind of defensive mechanism is indeed friendly to long-term players. Stablecoin pairs have low volatility, but the arbitrage opportunities are also a bit limited. The model is good; it all depends on how long the ecosystem can support it.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 10h ago

The logic of converting fees into points is indeed interesting, but I don't know how long it can last. Having deep liquidity in stablecoins doesn't necessarily mean there's a large arbitrage space; this needs to be thought through. Wait, just because top institutions support it doesn't mean it's reliable? I'm still a bit skeptical. The BNB ecosystem has introduced new things again. As I always say, those who rushed in early are already regretting it. It's basically just a different guise to raise funds; stablecoin pairs sound stable but are actually risky. This fee model reminds me of a few previous projects... none of them ended well. Having sufficient liquidity ≠ suitable for retail investors; it still depends on the depth of the order book.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 10h ago

The logic of converting stablecoin transaction fees into points is quite interesting, but I'm just worried it might be another new trick to trap retail investors.

View OriginalReply0