When participating in trading competitions or platform activities, we often face the hurdle of "trading volume requirements," such as needing to trade 500U to qualify. To save time, most people choose market orders instead of placing limit orders and slowly accumulating.



On the surface, this seems fine, but after actually executing the trades, you find that your account lost 2~3U, while the fee is only 0.1%? That doesn't add up.

Many think it's caused by coin price fluctuations or inexplicable fees, but the real problem often lies elsewhere.

**The price difference in the order book is the true hidden killer.**

Let me give a real example. How big is the difference for the same coin across different trading pairs?

FOGO / USDT trading pair:
- Buy 1: 0.04050
- Sell 1: 0.04051
- Spread: 0.00001

If you buy and sell once at market price, the theoretical cost is approximately: 0.00001 ÷ 0.04050 ≈ 0.00025, or about 2.5 basis points. This cost is close to a quarter of the fee, which is acceptable.

But switching to FOGO / USDC:
- Buy 1: 0.04037
- Sell 1: 0.04069
- Spread: 0.00032

The cost of a round-trip market trade becomes: 0.00032 ÷ 0.04037 ≈ 0.008, or 8 basis points. That's exactly 8 times the fee.

Honestly, **no matter how low the fee is, if the liquidity of the trading pair is poor, the bid-ask spread in the order book can wipe out your profits entirely.** Even if you carefully design your trading strategy to make a little money, this "hidden cost" can eat it all up in one go, and the feeling is hard to describe.

So next time you participate in a trading competition, don't just look at the fee discounts. Make sure to check the coin's liquidity and whether the spread is large. Sometimes choosing the right trading pair can protect your principal better than just hunting for fee discounts.
FOGO-28,64%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzlervip
· 7h ago
Damn it, it's this trap again. When boosting the volume, I accidentally got eaten up by the spread, really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 7h ago
actually the spread math checks out way worse than most people realize... saw this exact pattern drain accounts in 2021 when everyone was chasing volume requirements. TVL looked good on paper but order books were absolutely gutted. classic liquidity theater.
Reply0
NFTHoardervip
· 7h ago
Damn it, I'm always being tricked by these hidden fees. I should have paid more attention to the liquidity of trading pairs earlier.
View OriginalReply0
Degentlemanvip
· 7h ago
Really, I’ve fallen into this trap before. When boosting trading volume, I thought it was just transaction fees, but as a result, trading pairs with poor liquidity directly wiped me out.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)