2026-01-16 09:35:20

DFINITY often gets unfairly judged due to its tokenomics history—early VC rounds and token distribution patterns have unfortunately overshadowed its actual technical achievements. Yet the team has maintained relentless development momentum since 2017, quietly building infrastructure while others grabbed headlines. What's often overlooked: the Internet Computer is genuinely one of the few Layer-1 networks enabling true full-stack decentralized application deployment. From smart contracts to storage to computation, all on-chain. That's rare technical capability most networks simply don't offer. The perception gap between sentiment and reality is pretty significant here.

ICP1,41%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichVictim

· 8h ago

The core issue with IC is essentially the messed-up token distribution. No matter how advanced the technology is now, no one believes it anymore. --- Full-stack on-chain is indeed a unique feature, but the early funding approach has exhausted all goodwill. --- They keep talking about low-key development every day, but in reality, their reputation for early rug pulls is even louder. That's outrageous. --- Wait, are there really that many L1s capable of full-stack decentralized deployment? Or is this guy just bragging? --- I acknowledge IC's technical strength, but how many actually dare to deploy applications on it during a bear market... --- Tokenomics is a pit that will have to be filled sooner or later; otherwise, no matter how strong the technology is, it’s all in vain. --- Is the gap between perception and reality large? Mainly because trust is gone—blame the early VC investors.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 8h ago

IC's technology is indeed impressive, but the initial fundraising was too poorly handled. --- Honestly, the token distribution issue should have been put to rest long ago; the technical strength is there. --- Very few networks can achieve full-stack on-chain development; DFINITY has been underestimated. --- Early VC funding damaged the reputation; no matter how much hype now, some people just won't buy it. --- Quietly focusing on development for so many years, only to be characterized by one or two rounds of funding—it's a bit unfair. --- Other chains are promoting their ecosystems, while IC is quietly working behind the scenes—there's quite a difference.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 8h ago

IC, to be honest, has been tarnished by its token history, but the technical stack is indeed solid. NGL, those early funding issues were really annoying, but they've been working quietly these past few years and have some real capabilities. The full-stack on-chain approach... honestly, there aren't many in the industry who can do it, so this area is indeed highly competitive. The public opinion is poor, but the technology is solid, and I feel it's underestimated quite a bit. To be blunt, the real challenge for IC isn't the technology, but how to shed the VC baggage label.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 8h ago

IC's tech stack is indeed solid, but the early token distribution... from a risk control perspective, that's a hidden mine.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 8h ago

To be honest, DFINITY's stuff was already ruined by the black history of VC funding, and then everyone just couldn't listen anymore 🙃 IC's full-stack on-chain capabilities are indeed a rare commodity, but who still cares now? Public opinion has already sentenced it to death.

View OriginalReply0

BlockImposter

· 8h ago

NGL IC's technology is indeed underrated, but the reputation part has definitely hurt a bit. --- The tokenomics section was really weak, but now it's too lazy to use that as an excuse. --- Full-stack on-chain development is truly rare; most L1s are half-baked architectures. --- VC funding lineup is strong, but the public opinion has been completely lost... --- It took so many years of low-key development to gain recognition, which shows the market just loves hype too much. --- IC feels like a genius who can't get recognition—laughable. --- Storage and computing can both be on-chain, which other chains can't do. --- I've said it before, the disconnect between sentiment and fundamentals is just too absurd. --- Truly valuable projects are actually the most silent; it's those with nothing to say that keep hyping.

View OriginalReply0