【Crypto World】Recently, I came across a pretty interesting project—LiquidChain, which claims to use a three-layer network architecture to solve the problem of blockchain fragmentation. They are currently conducting a pre-sale of the $LIQUID token, with the price stuck at $0.013.
What is its core logic? It’s about connecting assets across the three mainstream chains—Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana—creating a unified execution environment that allows the liquidity to be shared and circulated across chains. This way, there’s no need to worry about cross-chain issues anymore.
From a tokenomics perspective, out of the total supply of 11.8 billion, 35% is directly allocated to development, indicating that the team is serious about technical development. The staking module adopts a decreasing APY design, with initial yields attracting early participants, and gradually adjusting to a reasonable level later on. This gradual decrease pattern is quite common and helps prevent excessive dilution.
Whether this project can succeed depends on execution capability and market acceptance. The liquidity aggregation sector is highly competitive, but if it can truly connect assets across the three chains, the improvement in user experience will be quite significant.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PessimisticOracle
· 8h ago
There are so many cross-chain projects, and what is this three-layer architecture... Honestly, it's just storytelling.
Allocating 35% to development sounds good, but these numbers come too easily. Projects with real issues have already started.
At a price of 0.013, let's wait and see, first see how things look in three months.
Decreasing APY, old trick, high initial returns attract people, and many naturally run away later.
Can BTC, ETH, and SOL liquidity really be unified? I feel like every new project wants to play this set.
Don't hype it up first, let's talk with data, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 8h ago
$0.013? This price is a bit too good to be true. It might just be another disguise for a cross-chain scam.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 8h ago
Another cross-chain dreamer, is 0.013 really cheap? Honestly, it still depends on the implementation of technology.
Wait, with a supply of 11.8 billion and 35% developed, what about the rest? Has the team invested money into it?
Unified liquidity sounds great, but the biggest risk for such projects is that after launch, copycat traders might dump the price. Will it really be unified then?
The pre-sale price is so low, isn't it just to attract retail investors? I see through the APY bait for early participants.
But honestly, if cross-chain interoperability can truly be achieved, the BTC ecosystem definitely needs this.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 8h ago
0.013 dollars in, and it's another cross-chain big project... Wait and see for now, there are too many projects like this.
LiquidChain Pre-sale Launch: Unlock BTC, ETH, SOL liquidity with just $0.013
【Crypto World】Recently, I came across a pretty interesting project—LiquidChain, which claims to use a three-layer network architecture to solve the problem of blockchain fragmentation. They are currently conducting a pre-sale of the $LIQUID token, with the price stuck at $0.013.
What is its core logic? It’s about connecting assets across the three mainstream chains—Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana—creating a unified execution environment that allows the liquidity to be shared and circulated across chains. This way, there’s no need to worry about cross-chain issues anymore.
From a tokenomics perspective, out of the total supply of 11.8 billion, 35% is directly allocated to development, indicating that the team is serious about technical development. The staking module adopts a decreasing APY design, with initial yields attracting early participants, and gradually adjusting to a reasonable level later on. This gradual decrease pattern is quite common and helps prevent excessive dilution.
Whether this project can succeed depends on execution capability and market acceptance. The liquidity aggregation sector is highly competitive, but if it can truly connect assets across the three chains, the improvement in user experience will be quite significant.