The debate over bitcoin’s future trajectory has intensified in recent weeks, with prominent voices challenging the relevance of historical patterns. Yet Fidelity’s Jurrien Timmer, Head of Global Macro, stands firmly on the side of cycle-based analysis, arguing that current market conditions align remarkably well with the established four-year phenomenon tied to halving events.
The Four-Year Pattern Explained
Bitcoin’s cyclical nature stems from its halving mechanism—a programmed event occurring roughly every four years that cuts mining rewards by half. This supply-side shock has historically triggered substantial price appreciation followed by pronounced downturns. The pattern has repeated since the 2012, 2016, and 2020 halvings, each culminating in dramatic bull runs and subsequent corrections of roughly 80%.
This year’s cycle appears to follow the script: BTC surged to approximately $125,000 in October 2025 after 145 weeks of continuous gains, then entered the anticipated correction phase. At current trading levels around $95.60K, the market is exhibiting textbook bear market behavior.
Challenging the Cycle Theory
Not everyone accepts this narrative. Bitwise’s Matt Hougan and ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood have recently argued that the four-year cycle is becoming obsolete. Their reasoning centers on structural changes: the proliferation of spot ETFs, regulatory clarity, and institutional adoption have fundamentally transformed bitcoin from a niche asset into a mainstream financial instrument. These developments, they contend, should theoretically eliminate the violent boom-bust dynamics of earlier eras.
Timmer’s Case for Cycle Persistence
Despite these arguments, Timmer’s technical analysis reveals no evidence that the pattern has broken down. By comparing the peaks across all major bull markets, he observes that the October peak at $125,000 aligns precisely with historical expectations. Visual charting confirms the cycle remains intact.
Regarding the immediate outlook, Timmer characterizes 2026 as likely to be a dormant period for bitcoin. The subsequent bear market phase typically extends roughly 12 months, during which price consolidation rather than dramatic moves should dominate. He identifies critical support in the $65,000 to $75,000 band—a level likely to become significant in the months ahead.
What This Means for Markets
The divergence between cycle theorists and their skeptics underscores a fundamental question: has bitcoin truly matured beyond its historical patterns, or do those patterns remain embedded in market psychology and on-chain dynamics? Timmer’s analysis suggests the latter—that even in an era of mainstream adoption, the four-year cycle continues to exert powerful influence over price discovery and market sentiment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin's 2026 Outlook: Why Jurrien Timmer Still Believes the Four-Year Cycle Holds True
The debate over bitcoin’s future trajectory has intensified in recent weeks, with prominent voices challenging the relevance of historical patterns. Yet Fidelity’s Jurrien Timmer, Head of Global Macro, stands firmly on the side of cycle-based analysis, arguing that current market conditions align remarkably well with the established four-year phenomenon tied to halving events.
The Four-Year Pattern Explained
Bitcoin’s cyclical nature stems from its halving mechanism—a programmed event occurring roughly every four years that cuts mining rewards by half. This supply-side shock has historically triggered substantial price appreciation followed by pronounced downturns. The pattern has repeated since the 2012, 2016, and 2020 halvings, each culminating in dramatic bull runs and subsequent corrections of roughly 80%.
This year’s cycle appears to follow the script: BTC surged to approximately $125,000 in October 2025 after 145 weeks of continuous gains, then entered the anticipated correction phase. At current trading levels around $95.60K, the market is exhibiting textbook bear market behavior.
Challenging the Cycle Theory
Not everyone accepts this narrative. Bitwise’s Matt Hougan and ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood have recently argued that the four-year cycle is becoming obsolete. Their reasoning centers on structural changes: the proliferation of spot ETFs, regulatory clarity, and institutional adoption have fundamentally transformed bitcoin from a niche asset into a mainstream financial instrument. These developments, they contend, should theoretically eliminate the violent boom-bust dynamics of earlier eras.
Timmer’s Case for Cycle Persistence
Despite these arguments, Timmer’s technical analysis reveals no evidence that the pattern has broken down. By comparing the peaks across all major bull markets, he observes that the October peak at $125,000 aligns precisely with historical expectations. Visual charting confirms the cycle remains intact.
Regarding the immediate outlook, Timmer characterizes 2026 as likely to be a dormant period for bitcoin. The subsequent bear market phase typically extends roughly 12 months, during which price consolidation rather than dramatic moves should dominate. He identifies critical support in the $65,000 to $75,000 band—a level likely to become significant in the months ahead.
What This Means for Markets
The divergence between cycle theorists and their skeptics underscores a fundamental question: has bitcoin truly matured beyond its historical patterns, or do those patterns remain embedded in market psychology and on-chain dynamics? Timmer’s analysis suggests the latter—that even in an era of mainstream adoption, the four-year cycle continues to exert powerful influence over price discovery and market sentiment.