ENA ultimately decided to abandon the blockchain launch plan. This move is indeed quite impressive. Users who originally had high expectations for the on-chain trading ecosystem will probably need to readjust their thinking. On the other hand, some exchanges are feeling a bit uncomfortable being caught up in this—previous ecosystem layout plans also need to be adjusted accordingly. Speaking of which, this kind of change actually reduces the workload for exchanges, as they no longer need to frequently modify integration plans with project teams. The crypto ecosystem is like that—when project decisions change, all related links have to adapt anew. ENA's decision, to some extent, also reflects the cautious attitude of project teams when it comes to strategic adjustments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 9h ago
Haha, ENA's move this time is indeed a bit flashy. Where's the promised chain?
---
Another abandoned project, this is the daily life of Web3.
---
Exchanges are probably also quite annoyed, constantly changing requirements every day. Isn't that tiring?
---
Project teams being cautious? I think they just ran out of money.
---
So what are those who all-in on the ENA chain ecosystem doing now?
---
Anyway, exchanges are relieved, no need to keep changing integration plans. It’s more convenient.
---
This is the usual operation in the crypto circle; plans never keep up with changes.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 9h ago
Well, this wave of ENA just let everyone down. Players must be feeling extremely frustrated.
ENA ultimately decided to abandon the blockchain launch plan. This move is indeed quite impressive. Users who originally had high expectations for the on-chain trading ecosystem will probably need to readjust their thinking. On the other hand, some exchanges are feeling a bit uncomfortable being caught up in this—previous ecosystem layout plans also need to be adjusted accordingly. Speaking of which, this kind of change actually reduces the workload for exchanges, as they no longer need to frequently modify integration plans with project teams. The crypto ecosystem is like that—when project decisions change, all related links have to adapt anew. ENA's decision, to some extent, also reflects the cautious attitude of project teams when it comes to strategic adjustments.