#数字资产市场动态 $DOGE $SHIB $PEPE's story is no longer new, but there's a question worth pondering: why do so many Meme coins claim to be decentralized yet tightly hold onto contract permissions?
Very few projects actually dare to delegate authority. Some coins have already implemented DAO governance systems, where every important decision is made through holder voting — this is what a community's voice should look like. In three months, the number of addresses increased by 170%, but this isn't a figure that can be achieved just by a few influencers shouting out. Behind it are real application scenarios like pet-raising gameplay and content co-creation mechanisms driving the growth.
From another perspective, the community itself should be the true owner of the project. Those coins still playing centralized tricks will eventually be seen through by investors. The market is evolving, and participants are becoming smarter.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OfflineValidator
· 3h ago
Basically, it's the same old trick—claiming to be decentralized while actually controlling everything behind the scenes.
I've rarely seen anyone truly willing to delegate authority; most are just using it as a way to scam the newcomers.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 9h ago
lol "decentralized" memes holding admin keys like it's 2021 all over again... the math literally doesn't check out here
Reply0
SolidityJester
· 9h ago
That's right, the logic is sound. Projects that claim decentralization but secretly hold control should indeed fade away.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 9h ago
That's right. Those projects that claim decentralization but tightly control permissions will all fail.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 9h ago
Well said, but do those Meme coins really dare to decentralize? It seems like just talk
Genuine DAO governance projects are indeed rare; most are still controlled by the core team
A 170% increase in addresses is indeed astonishing, but it depends on the sustainability
Community owner? Let's wait and see; it depends on whether this round of the market is stable
Holding tight control over contract permissions, I think they'll eventually fail sooner or later
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 9h ago
Exactly right. These projects are still performing, but the contract permissions are tightly controlled, no different from centralized systems.
The few projects I’ve seen truly delegate authority, while the rest are just on paper decentralization.
DAO governance is indeed impressive. Voting and decision-making give the community real influence, unlike now where big V influencers pull the strings.
A 170% increase in address count shows that the core gameplay is attractive, not just a scheme to harvest users.
Those coins still holding onto permissions will eventually crash. Who still believes in that stuff now?
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 9h ago
Basically, it's the same old story with a different wrapping; truly decentralized projects are few and far between.
#数字资产市场动态 $DOGE $SHIB $PEPE's story is no longer new, but there's a question worth pondering: why do so many Meme coins claim to be decentralized yet tightly hold onto contract permissions?
Very few projects actually dare to delegate authority. Some coins have already implemented DAO governance systems, where every important decision is made through holder voting — this is what a community's voice should look like. In three months, the number of addresses increased by 170%, but this isn't a figure that can be achieved just by a few influencers shouting out. Behind it are real application scenarios like pet-raising gameplay and content co-creation mechanisms driving the growth.
From another perspective, the community itself should be the true owner of the project. Those coins still playing centralized tricks will eventually be seen through by investors. The market is evolving, and participants are becoming smarter.