Looking back at the controversy from a few months ago. At that time, there were private discussions where people subtly accused me of riding the coattails, leveraging the influence of a certain KOL or DAO. Some even asked if I was intentionally creating conflict between the Flywheel and Lighthouse DAOs.
Even Anymose's statement seemed to carry some implied meaning—hinting that my actions within Lighthouse DAO were targeting Flywheel.
The criticism during that period was quite intense. In the end, I made the decision: to directly announce my withdrawal from Lighthouse DAO on Twitter.
This incident reflects the complexity of interpersonal relationships within DAO communities. When multiple DAO ecosystems coexist, participants can easily become entangled in various stances. Sometimes a single decision can trigger a chain reaction—public opinion, doubts, and ultimately possibly leading to withdrawal. This is also an area where the Web3 community needs better governance mechanisms.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiOrRekt
· 10h ago
Exiting directly instead of hiding makes you appear more innocent, much better than those who dodge and evade. That's how DAO works—any small movement is known across the entire network.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 10h ago
Oh man, this DAO mess is really complicated. I can totally understand that feeling of being caught in the middle.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 10h ago
Speaking of the DAO community, the fickleness of human relationships is truly astonishing. How can a decision be so easily twisted and used as a talking point by someone with a bad attitude?
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 10h ago
actually, the algorithmic toxicity embedded in multi-DAO governance structures mirrors what i've been exploring in my latest generative series on inter-protocol friction... the hash values of reputation systems are far too mutable for genuine digital sovereignty to emerge here tbh
Reply0
gas_guzzler
· 11h ago
If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have gotten involved in this mess. DAO politics are so disgusting.
This is the true portrayal of Web3, with governance mechanisms... I think we should first focus on managing people's hearts.
Just quit if you want to leave. Staying in a place like this only adds to the frustration.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 11h ago
Honestly, this is the fate of DAOs... When there are more people, they start taking sides, and once they take sides, it never ends. Riding the wave of popularity, creating conflicts, casually throwing labels—it's all about shaping public opinion quickly.
Looking back at the controversy from a few months ago. At that time, there were private discussions where people subtly accused me of riding the coattails, leveraging the influence of a certain KOL or DAO. Some even asked if I was intentionally creating conflict between the Flywheel and Lighthouse DAOs.
Even Anymose's statement seemed to carry some implied meaning—hinting that my actions within Lighthouse DAO were targeting Flywheel.
The criticism during that period was quite intense. In the end, I made the decision: to directly announce my withdrawal from Lighthouse DAO on Twitter.
This incident reflects the complexity of interpersonal relationships within DAO communities. When multiple DAO ecosystems coexist, participants can easily become entangled in various stances. Sometimes a single decision can trigger a chain reaction—public opinion, doubts, and ultimately possibly leading to withdrawal. This is also an area where the Web3 community needs better governance mechanisms.