Some projects based on creator incentives ultimately fail, and the fundamental issue lies in the design of the incentive structure itself. From the very beginning, perceptive observers have seen through the problem—there is a misalignment between incentives and actual value contribution.
What should be the true solution? It should both take care of those big V creators who are dedicated to content creation and provide survival space for small but specialized vertical creators. Both types of creators have value—one brings a broad user base, and the other contributes high-quality professional content. The key is how to enable both to receive rewards that match their contributions, rather than letting the incentive mechanism become a bubble. Only when creators can genuinely feel that their labor is recognized can the ecosystem achieve a healthy cycle.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractHunter
· 18h ago
Basically, it's the same old story of hype and empty promises. The incentive structure was originally designed to trap retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 18h ago
That's right, misaligned incentives are seen too often. The key is to ensure that small V can also survive and not be completely consumed by big V.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 18h ago
Basically, the old trick of hyping up promises has been exposed again. The incentive structure was poorly designed from the start, and it was too late to regret later.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 18h ago
That's right, these are the common issues that plague those projects before they fail. Once the incentive structure is designed poorly, it's hard to fix it later no matter what.
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 18h ago
On-chain data has long labeled this incentive logic as high risk, but we still charged forward one after another. The problem isn't with the incentives themselves, but with no one truly believing they can make it to the final stretch.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 19h ago
Basically, it's just that the distribution system wasn't handled well, and in the end, everything fell apart.
Some projects based on creator incentives ultimately fail, and the fundamental issue lies in the design of the incentive structure itself. From the very beginning, perceptive observers have seen through the problem—there is a misalignment between incentives and actual value contribution.
What should be the true solution? It should both take care of those big V creators who are dedicated to content creation and provide survival space for small but specialized vertical creators. Both types of creators have value—one brings a broad user base, and the other contributes high-quality professional content. The key is how to enable both to receive rewards that match their contributions, rather than letting the incentive mechanism become a bubble. Only when creators can genuinely feel that their labor is recognized can the ecosystem achieve a healthy cycle.