2026-01-17 14:31:58

"A world computer has no centralized overlord"—this logic why should it accept centralized sequencers? If decentralization is the foundation, it can't be a feature we pick and choose. We're building Ethereum's scaling layer with trustlessness at the core. No shortcuts. That's the only path forward. 🥁

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gm_or_ngmi

· 2h ago

Well said, that's exactly the point. Decentralization can't be selective; it has to be thorough.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 2h ago

Well said, the issue of centralized schedulers is indeed a headache. Either completely decentralize or stop hyping the so-called world computer; this logic makes perfect sense.

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 2h ago

Well said, you can't just shout about decentralization and then turn around and use centralized ranking algorithms. Isn't that a contradiction?

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 2h ago

There's nothing wrong with that, but in reality? Most people just prefer convenience, so why be so idealistic?

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 3h ago

Well said, this is the true spirit of Web3, not just shouting about decentralization and then turning around to use centralized sequencers, which is a self-contradiction.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b