Remember the craze of DeFi Summer that year? Uniswap, Curve, Balancer, and other DEX platforms showcased their unique features, with countless fork projects flooding in, making the competition intensely fierce. Today, the wallet race centered around Hyperliquid is, to some extent, replaying that history.
This time, major wallet providers are all integrating into the Hyperliquid ecosystem. It seems lively and bustling, but the underlying business logic is worth pondering. Who can profit from this? Is it the wallets themselves gaining user stickiness and sharing transaction fees? Or is it just a passive follow-the-trend move chasing the hype?
Compared to the prosperity of DEXs back then, we see that only a few projects ultimately survive and gain value. How will history repeat itself in the Perps market? Whether the wallet race is a blue ocean or a red ocean depends ultimately on the real needs of the ecosystem and its long-term ability to generate sustainable growth.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Observer
· 3h ago
Let me check the data. Can Hyperliquid really survive this wave compared to projects from DeFi Summer? It feels like everyone is betting, but most might just be riding along.
From a source code perspective, the model is no different from liquidity mining... There's a misconception here; everyone talks about user stickiness, but will wallet users really switch wallets just because of a Perps ecosystem? That's unlikely.
Technically speaking, can Hyperliquid's order book depth support so many wallets? Further verification is needed.
History is repeating itself, but each time some people just can't learn. The few that survive are those who can't be learned from.
Overall, the wallet track this time is worse than DEX Summer because DEX at least generated real trading volume. What about wallets? How much can fee sharing generate? Uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 3h ago
History is really repeating itself... How many of those fork projects from DeFi Summer are still alive now?
Another wave of wallet arms race, probably only a few that can make money.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 3h ago
Basically, it's a remake of the DEX from back then, but this time it's just wallets competing for Hyperliquid.
History always repeats itself; in the end, only a few will survive.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 4h ago
Once again, history repeats itself, this time with wallets taking the plunge.
It seems to be another wave of big companies following the trend to show off, but only a few are truly profiting.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 4h ago
It's the same story again. DEX has only been around for a few years, and now it's happening once more.
Basically, it all depends on who can capture the traffic; the real profit probably still goes to those big wallets.
How long can Hyperliquid's popularity last? It doesn't seem very optimistic.
The fee sharing looks good on paper, but how much do you actually get?
It's just a historical cycle; in the end, most will still die out.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 4h ago
It's the same scam again, looks familiar
---
Who really made money in this round of Hyperliquid? Isn't it the exchanges and wallet providers?
---
I'm tired of hearing about historical cycles. The question is, will this be another game of hot potato this time?
---
A true blue ocean? Come on, my friend, the money has already been siphoned off by the top players.
---
Major wallets rushing in en masse, honestly they're just afraid of missing the dividend period, haven't even thought clearly about what to earn.
---
What happened to the projects from DeFi Summer? Don't tell me you're going to forget the lessons again.
Remember the craze of DeFi Summer that year? Uniswap, Curve, Balancer, and other DEX platforms showcased their unique features, with countless fork projects flooding in, making the competition intensely fierce. Today, the wallet race centered around Hyperliquid is, to some extent, replaying that history.
This time, major wallet providers are all integrating into the Hyperliquid ecosystem. It seems lively and bustling, but the underlying business logic is worth pondering. Who can profit from this? Is it the wallets themselves gaining user stickiness and sharing transaction fees? Or is it just a passive follow-the-trend move chasing the hype?
Compared to the prosperity of DEXs back then, we see that only a few projects ultimately survive and gain value. How will history repeat itself in the Perps market? Whether the wallet race is a blue ocean or a red ocean depends ultimately on the real needs of the ecosystem and its long-term ability to generate sustainable growth.