The answer is in the numbers. Analyze the top 1000 market winners over the past 100 years and you'll see the pattern. Moving averages are not a coincidence—they are a tool that has worked historically.
The interesting part is that institutions also know this. Funds, asset managers, major trading platforms—all use technical analysis in their strategies. This is not something retail traders invented.
When you see that market elites rely on these tools, it starts to make sense. Historical data speaks for itself.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoDeveloper
· 4h ago
ngl the institutional adoption angle here is actually the composability play nobody talks about—when you've got that many parallel actors running the same consensus mechanism (moving averages), it becomes self-reinforcing. that's just emergent game theory tbh
Reply0
QuietlyStaking
· 4h ago
Damn, all the institutions are using technical analysis, and you're still asking why to trust it.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 4h ago
Historical data speaks for itself; institutions are already using it. What are you hesitating for?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 4h ago
Enough, enough. You're teaching me to use moving averages again? I already know that institutions are using them. The question is, how can we retail investors use them to make money?
Why trust moving averages?
The answer is in the numbers. Analyze the top 1000 market winners over the past 100 years and you'll see the pattern. Moving averages are not a coincidence—they are a tool that has worked historically.
The interesting part is that institutions also know this. Funds, asset managers, major trading platforms—all use technical analysis in their strategies. This is not something retail traders invented.
When you see that market elites rely on these tools, it starts to make sense. Historical data speaks for itself.