Technology adoption hinges on people, not algorithms alone. Even the most sophisticated model becomes useless if users won't touch it, don't trust it, or have no reason to change how they work. It's that simple. A breakthrough AI is nothing without user buy-in. Behavior shift is the real bottleneck—not the engineering challenge, but the human one. Until people see the value and decide to act differently, any advanced system just sits there, collecting dust.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 5h ago
Exactly right, that's why so many cool things end up nobody using them.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 5h ago
Well said. No matter how awesome the model is, it has to be accepted by people.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 6h ago
nah fr, the algorithm's only as good as the yield it promises people... if there's no immediate liquidity incentive or risk-adjusted return, they're not touching it. reminds me of failed protocol launches where the smartest contracts meant nothing without TVL
Technology adoption hinges on people, not algorithms alone. Even the most sophisticated model becomes useless if users won't touch it, don't trust it, or have no reason to change how they work. It's that simple. A breakthrough AI is nothing without user buy-in. Behavior shift is the real bottleneck—not the engineering challenge, but the human one. Until people see the value and decide to act differently, any advanced system just sits there, collecting dust.