According to the standard rules of classical technical analysis, once the price movement from the first high point to the apex exceeds 70%, it can no longer be considered a valid symmetrical triangle. So what's the problem? Once in this situation, upward or downward breakouts become hard to trust. $NQ_F is a real-life example—appearing to break out, but in fact, the reliability of breakout signals under this pattern is significantly reduced. This is especially important for short-term traders, so don't be fooled by seemingly "perfect" charts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeAssassin
· 2h ago
A 70% margin and it's useless, who set that rule? $NQ_F is now just a worthless asset.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 2h ago
That 70% curse, once you step on it, it's really useless. How many people got caught in the NQ_F trap with this wave?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 2h ago
A 70% margin breaks the chart. Who would have thought? Even seemingly perfect formations are traps.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 3h ago
Is 70% volatility already a failure? Then half of the charts must all be scams, haha
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 3h ago
70% is really a tough barrier. NQ_F this wave is indeed a textbook-level trap. It looks perfect but is actually a false breakout.
View OriginalReply0
MetamaskMechanic
· 3h ago
This tricky triangle pattern is too deep; the seemingly perfect chart is the easiest way to trap people.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 3h ago
70% crossing the threshold exposes it. Such a simple rule and people still get scammed, haha
According to the standard rules of classical technical analysis, once the price movement from the first high point to the apex exceeds 70%, it can no longer be considered a valid symmetrical triangle. So what's the problem? Once in this situation, upward or downward breakouts become hard to trust. $NQ_F is a real-life example—appearing to break out, but in fact, the reliability of breakout signals under this pattern is significantly reduced. This is especially important for short-term traders, so don't be fooled by seemingly "perfect" charts.