2026-01-18 00:38:10

DASH is not suitable for traders who pursue certainty.

Seeing people shouting manipulation as the price plunges from the high points. But most overlook the key detail: that is a liquidity sweep.

The real movement is like this — the price hits the previous high, triggering stop-losses from momentum traders, then stops falling at the true accumulation of buy orders. What appears to be a sharp decline is actually large funds clearing out floating positions before building a position. The subsequent failure to break lower is because there is already sufficient support below.

These details determine whether you are being shaken out or riding the rebound with smart money.

DASH-12,27%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-4814a34d

· 2h ago

Agree👍👍

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 2h ago

It's the same liquidity sweep routine, I've heard it a thousand times... but this time it was really explained in detail. It's the same liquidity sweep, always said like that, but this time it seems to be true. Big capital clearing operations look simple, but how many actually dodge it? Not everyone can see through these details; most have been washed out. What sounds nice is a cleanup, but in reality, it's just eating retail investors' stop-losses before rising again. This wave indeed didn't break below again; there are indeed people absorbing it below, but... whether it can rebound this time is still uncertain. Honestly, chasing certainty by trading DASH is just asking for trouble.

View OriginalReply0

StableNomad

· 2h ago

honestly the "smart money" narrative always cracks me up... statistically speaking those stop hunts are real but so is the copium lmao. seen this exact playbook back in the luna days—"oh it's just liquidity sweeps bro" and then it wasn't. risk-adjusted returns on holding through these dumps are... well let's just say my premium/discount ratio says otherwise ngl

Reply0

ForkTongue

· 2h ago

Oh no, it's that liquidity sweep again... It sounds convincing, but I feel like it's just armchair strategizing after the fact.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 2h ago

Alright, to be honest, I was washed out in that wave. Now watching the rebound and winning, it's really incredible.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 3h ago

Another set of cleaning theories, which sounds nice but is basically just cutting leeks Even when breaking the support level, they claim it's just accumulation, so I'm losing money while learning haha I really don't want this kind of certainty anymore

View OriginalReply0