Recently, the intense competition in the AI assistant market has become quite evident—Apple has deeply integrated Gemini into the core of the iOS system, and Google has seized the system-level invocation rights; on the other hand, OpenAI is also not willing to fall behind, launching a cheaper version of ChatGPT and experimenting with model advertising monetization. The fierce battle between the two sides is becoming more intense.
Why is the competition so fierce? The logic is quite straightforward: when Siri can directly invoke system-level permissions to help you book tickets, send emails, and handle daily tasks, what reason do users have to tap the screen multiple times to open a standalone ChatGPT app? Clearly none. System-level integration itself is a trump card—it saves users operation steps and reduces app switching costs.
This reflects a larger trend: AI is no longer an independent tool but is gradually becoming a native feature of the operating system. Whoever can dominate the system core will be able to take the lead in this competition. Therefore, the competition is not just about features but a survival battle for system-level entry points.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaLeaker
· 6h ago
The system-level entrance is the new era's traffic entrance; whoever controls the system wins half of the internet.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 6h ago
System-level integration is truly top-notch; no matter how cheap OpenAI is, it can't withstand being locked in the app store.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 6h ago
The system-level entry point is the key to victory; whoever grabs it wins. OpenAI's move is indeed a bit passive.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 6h ago
System-level entry is a new territory; whoever secures the position wins.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 6h ago
System-level integration is a masterstroke; even if OpenAI becomes cheaper, it's just scratching the surface.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 6h ago
The system-level entry point is the modern channel dominance; whoever controls the system controls the user's throat.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 6h ago
The arbitrage opportunities at the system-level entry point are disappearing, and this is the real area worth paying attention to. What does iOS deep integration mean? It means that the liquidity of user choice is directly locked in... OpenAI's cheap version and ad monetization are defensive measures taken out of necessity, not offensive strategies.
Recently, the intense competition in the AI assistant market has become quite evident—Apple has deeply integrated Gemini into the core of the iOS system, and Google has seized the system-level invocation rights; on the other hand, OpenAI is also not willing to fall behind, launching a cheaper version of ChatGPT and experimenting with model advertising monetization. The fierce battle between the two sides is becoming more intense.
Why is the competition so fierce? The logic is quite straightforward: when Siri can directly invoke system-level permissions to help you book tickets, send emails, and handle daily tasks, what reason do users have to tap the screen multiple times to open a standalone ChatGPT app? Clearly none. System-level integration itself is a trump card—it saves users operation steps and reduces app switching costs.
This reflects a larger trend: AI is no longer an independent tool but is gradually becoming a native feature of the operating system. Whoever can dominate the system core will be able to take the lead in this competition. Therefore, the competition is not just about features but a survival battle for system-level entry points.