【Blockchain Rhythm】After a crypto project is hacked, the real crisis often isn’t the initial loss of funds, but the chaos in response that follows.
According to data from the Web3 security platform Immunefi, nearly 80% of crypto projects that suffer major hacks never fully recover. The story behind this number is much more complex than simple theft of funds.
Immunefi points out that most protocols share the same problem — they have no clear understanding of their hacking risks and lack operational plans to handle major security incidents. As a result, once a vulnerability is exposed, the entire team falls into a passive state.
The most critical period is the first few hours. This timeframe often determines the subsequent course of action. Without a prepared emergency plan, team members start to shift blame, discuss what to do, which features to suspend, how to notify users — and time slips away amid these debates. Consequently, the impact of the vulnerability continues to grow, and losses that could have been contained keep spreading.
There is also a subtle psychological factor at play: fear of reputation damage. Many project teams prefer to remain silent rather than proactively pause smart contracts or issue immediate risk warnings. This “ostrich strategy” often backfires — users don’t receive official information, and in the vacuum of information, rumors spread rapidly, causing panic to escalate. The terror of silence is far more damaging than transparent bad news.
The reason why 80% of projects that fail to fully recover often collapse is usually due to this: initial response chaos leading to trust erosion, community loss, ecosystem partner disintegration, and the subsequent breakdown of operational systems. In comparison, the initial financial loss is a secondary issue.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZenZKPlayer
· 3h ago
80% can't turn things around, to be honest, it's because the groundwork wasn't done well in the beginning... Once something goes wrong, everything gets chaotic. Emergency plans really need to be prepared in advance.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 3h ago
This is a typical mess. Getting hacked and then fighting among yourselves—it's really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 3h ago
80% can't turn around... To put it simply, it's because the initial preparations weren't done properly, and when the problem arose, everyone was panicking.
---
So the core issue isn't how strong the hackers are, but that the project itself wasn't prepared at all.
---
Haha, the first few hours really are a life-and-death moment. Some people were still in meetings figuring out what to do, while the hackers had already fled without a trace.
---
Why does it seem like most projects are just like people with nothing to do, only realizing there's a risk after being exposed?
---
Emergency plans are like insurance; when you don't need them, everyone thinks it's a waste of money. But when something really happens, it's too late to regret.
---
The team’s blame-shifting routine is really hilarious—no one wants to take responsibility, and in the end, users lose everything.
---
These new projects really should find a security company to review thoroughly. Don't always think about launching quickly to make money.
---
The 80% figure isn't really surprising; what we fear most is the trust crisis after such chaotic handling.
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmer
· 3h ago
80% can't turn things around... To put it plainly, it's the team's failure. Projects without contingency plans deserve to be criticized.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 3h ago
Basically, it's chaos after getting hacked; not having a plan is a fatal flaw.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 3h ago
To be honest, this 80% of the data is quite heartbreaking... Many projects are actually dragged down by their own reaction speed, not by hackers.
Why can't nearly 80% of blacklisted projects ever turn around? Experts reveal the golden rules for dealing with hackers
【Blockchain Rhythm】After a crypto project is hacked, the real crisis often isn’t the initial loss of funds, but the chaos in response that follows.
According to data from the Web3 security platform Immunefi, nearly 80% of crypto projects that suffer major hacks never fully recover. The story behind this number is much more complex than simple theft of funds.
Immunefi points out that most protocols share the same problem — they have no clear understanding of their hacking risks and lack operational plans to handle major security incidents. As a result, once a vulnerability is exposed, the entire team falls into a passive state.
The most critical period is the first few hours. This timeframe often determines the subsequent course of action. Without a prepared emergency plan, team members start to shift blame, discuss what to do, which features to suspend, how to notify users — and time slips away amid these debates. Consequently, the impact of the vulnerability continues to grow, and losses that could have been contained keep spreading.
There is also a subtle psychological factor at play: fear of reputation damage. Many project teams prefer to remain silent rather than proactively pause smart contracts or issue immediate risk warnings. This “ostrich strategy” often backfires — users don’t receive official information, and in the vacuum of information, rumors spread rapidly, causing panic to escalate. The terror of silence is far more damaging than transparent bad news.
The reason why 80% of projects that fail to fully recover often collapse is usually due to this: initial response chaos leading to trust erosion, community loss, ecosystem partner disintegration, and the subsequent breakdown of operational systems. In comparison, the initial financial loss is a secondary issue.