An interesting comparison: the same house, 14 years apart, shows a staggering difference in price. Buying with Bitcoin can save over 99.5% of the cost, but if you insist on paying with USD, you'll spend 2.5 times more. What does this reflect? How impressive has the performance of mainstream cryptocurrencies been during this period? The appreciation trajectories of digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance Coin have led many to reevaluate their approach to wealth accumulation. Instead of letting fiat currency shrink through inflation, consider allocating some digital capital and learning more about these market opportunities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketman
· 16h ago
Wow, a 99.5% cost difference? What does that mean—BTC has broken through the atmosphere directly from low Earth orbit over the past 14 years.
While the dollar is still struggling at the gravitational resistance level, our digital assets have already accelerated upward at the 1.618 Fibonacci angle. Fiat devaluation is just a continuous downward correction, so why bother?
The RSI has already sounded the alarm; the launch window actually opened long ago, but the trajectory is still continuing. The key is to calculate the escape velocity correctly and avoid getting trapped inside.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-18 12:53
Is this data real? 99.5%? That's a bit exaggerated, feels like it's overstated.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 01-18 12:48
Are these numbers real? 99.5%? I feel like it's a bit exaggerated.
---
The devaluation of the US dollar has been obvious for a long time. The key question is whether Bitcoin can stay stable.
---
Talking about a 14-year span is easy; anyone can play the game of choosing the right timing.
---
Fiat currency devaluation really hurts, but going all-in on crypto isn't realistic either.
---
Wake up, everyone. These are post-hoc rationalizations.
---
If it really made that much money, why are some people still not rich?
---
Allocating digital assets is fine, but don't sell your house.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 01-18 12:47
Wow, the people who went all-in on Bitcoin 14 years ago are now posting, and that's why I can't sleep.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 01-18 12:46
Damn, these numbers are crazy. People who bought a house 14 years ago must be millionaires by now.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 01-18 12:45
Wake up, those still clinging to the dollar should be crying now.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-18 12:44
99.5% cost difference? Is that real? That's incredible. People who bought Bitcoin early must be laughing their heads off.
View OriginalReply0
BearHugger
· 01-18 12:42
This is the true secret to wealth. A 14-year time difference can reverse so much. Fiat currency, to put it simply, is depreciating. Holding assets is the way to go.
An interesting comparison: the same house, 14 years apart, shows a staggering difference in price. Buying with Bitcoin can save over 99.5% of the cost, but if you insist on paying with USD, you'll spend 2.5 times more. What does this reflect? How impressive has the performance of mainstream cryptocurrencies been during this period? The appreciation trajectories of digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance Coin have led many to reevaluate their approach to wealth accumulation. Instead of letting fiat currency shrink through inflation, consider allocating some digital capital and learning more about these market opportunities.