$ZEN was still hailed yesterday as a dark horse in the privacy track, but it dropped 13% in just one day, crashing from $13 to $11.3. Watching the market sentiment weaken, retail investors are cutting losses, while institutions are quietly moving—Grayscale has silently accumulated nearly one million ZEN, accounting for over 5% of the circulating supply.
This phenomenon is quite interesting. In simple terms, it is a true reflection of market divergence: retail focuses on the ups and downs of the K-line, while institutions are still adding chips to their baskets. The underlying logical differences go far beyond just psychology.
Retail investors are easily frightened by daily chart-level fluctuations, whereas institutions hold a set of "tolerance systems." This system is not some mystical technique nor solely supported by faith, but a mechanism that allows assets to continuously generate returns amid bull and bear transitions and market volatility.
The core idea is: maximize capital efficiency so that assets no longer depend on the rise and fall of a single coin. No matter how sideways your BNB or ETH are, they can continuously generate cash flow. This is the confidence that allows institutions to dare to go against the trend.
Therefore, while discussing ZEN or other privacy coins, understanding foundational protocols like ListaDAO becomes especially important. It’s not about abandoning narratives or chasing trends, but about adding a "buffer" while pursuing them.
What ListaDAO does is quite straightforward—it is a DeFi protocol that integrates liquidity staking and interest-bearing stablecoins. This may not sound groundbreaking, but its design breaks the constraints of traditional staking models.
Traditional staking works like this: you lock your coins, wait for rewards, and liquidity is frozen. When can you use it? You have no idea. ListaDAO’s idea is to invert this model: your staked assets also earn a "liquidity twin." For example, if you stake BNB in this protocol, you not only earn staking rewards but also receive an lstBNB token as a liquidity certificate. This certificate can continue to circulate in the market and even be used to participate in other DeFi strategies.
In other words, your assets are "split" into two versions: one continuously generating returns in the background, and the other remaining liquid in the front, ready to be traded at any time. This is what is called an "asset productive state"—no longer a binary choice (hold or trade), but the benefit of having both simultaneously.
This logic is completely different for investors with different risk preferences.
For example, if you are an investor optimistic about the privacy coin track but somewhat uneasy about short-term volatility, the conventional approach is: pour money into ZEN, then either hold, cut losses, or repeatedly stop-loss. ListaDAO’s approach is on a different dimension: you can use the interest-bearing stablecoins generated from staking to implement low-risk yield strategies, while leaving the growth potential of your main assets to the long-term narrative of privacy coins. The asset structure becomes more flexible, and the returns more three-dimensional.
There are many protocols like this in the market, but ListaDAO’s advantage lies in its obsession with capital efficiency. It is not simply stacking features but designing systematically so that every asset works according to the investor’s intent. This system is especially useful in a bear market.
Returning to the story of ZEN, why does Grayscale dare to buy when everyone else is cutting losses? On one hand, it’s a long-term confidence in the privacy narrative; on the other hand, their cost structure and holdings are different. Their assets can generate cash flow in various market environments, so short-term price pain points are less deadly.
This is the fundamental difference between institutions and retail investors—not capital size, but asset productivity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HodlTheDoor
· 1h ago
Retail investors sell at a loss while institutions scoop up the bottom, the gap is truly enormous.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 14h ago
Once again, the argument that "institutions are buying while retail investors are getting slaughtered" is really getting tiresome.
Is it really just because Grayscale accumulated a lot that everyone is hyping it up? Retail investors like us don't have that capital efficiency system; no matter what we buy, we face the risk of zeroing out. Can holding staked tokens and earning interest on them really make life better? That's too naive.
Regarding the recent decline of ZEN, to be blunt, no matter how many buffers and cushions there are, they can't save a coin whose narrative is weakening. ListaDAO, no matter how impressive, is just a tactic; in the end, it still depends on the underlying asset itself.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 01-18 12:56
It's the old trick of institutions buying the dip and retail investors getting liquidated—how many times do we have to fall for this routine before getting tired of it?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 01-18 12:56
Retail investors are still debating whether ZEN will fall or rise, while Grayscale is already preparing for the next wave. This gap really isn't about money.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-18 12:51
Once again, the same argument of "institutions have a system, retail investors have no brains." I'm really tired of hearing it.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 01-18 12:50
It's that same narrative again, "institutions are buying while retail investors are selling," but it does hit a nerve.
It sounds reasonable, but I feel like the ListaDAO part is a bit awkwardly inserted.
Grayscale holding ZEN isn't something to mystify; it's just a long-term bet, has nothing to do with any tolerance system.
This logical chain... can capital efficiency cure retail investors' mindset of cutting losses?
Hey wait, the more I read, the more it seems like a sponsored article.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 01-18 12:46
Retail investors cut losses while institutions scoop up the bottom; I've seen this script too many times. The key is still having cash flow; otherwise, just holding coins can suffocate people.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 01-18 12:37
Retail investors get wiped out, and institutions scoop up the bottom. I'm tired of this routine.
---
Grayscale holds a million ZEN tokens. I wonder if they really believe in it or if they're just trying to shake us out again.
---
The core difference lies in production efficiency. In simple terms, it's the gap between the poor and the rich.
---
Can staking still remain liquid? If it really works well, why isn't anyone hyping it?
---
Here comes another promotion for ListaDAO. Feels like these articles are all sponsored content.
---
Institutions' "buffer," retail investors' "chives field," old tricks.
---
I sold my ZEN when it dropped from 13 to 11, but after reading this article, I started to regret it.
---
Why do institutions dare to operate counter to the trend? Because they aren't afraid of losing money. We can't afford to lose.
---
Earning interest on stablecoins, liquidity certificates... sounds impressive, but how does it work in practice?
---
Maximizing capital efficiency, that's correct, but isn't it still a game of bottom-fishing for retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-18 12:29
Grayscale is eating up, retail investors are bleeding, isn't that how the gap is created?
$ZEN was still hailed yesterday as a dark horse in the privacy track, but it dropped 13% in just one day, crashing from $13 to $11.3. Watching the market sentiment weaken, retail investors are cutting losses, while institutions are quietly moving—Grayscale has silently accumulated nearly one million ZEN, accounting for over 5% of the circulating supply.
This phenomenon is quite interesting. In simple terms, it is a true reflection of market divergence: retail focuses on the ups and downs of the K-line, while institutions are still adding chips to their baskets. The underlying logical differences go far beyond just psychology.
Retail investors are easily frightened by daily chart-level fluctuations, whereas institutions hold a set of "tolerance systems." This system is not some mystical technique nor solely supported by faith, but a mechanism that allows assets to continuously generate returns amid bull and bear transitions and market volatility.
The core idea is: maximize capital efficiency so that assets no longer depend on the rise and fall of a single coin. No matter how sideways your BNB or ETH are, they can continuously generate cash flow. This is the confidence that allows institutions to dare to go against the trend.
Therefore, while discussing ZEN or other privacy coins, understanding foundational protocols like ListaDAO becomes especially important. It’s not about abandoning narratives or chasing trends, but about adding a "buffer" while pursuing them.
What ListaDAO does is quite straightforward—it is a DeFi protocol that integrates liquidity staking and interest-bearing stablecoins. This may not sound groundbreaking, but its design breaks the constraints of traditional staking models.
Traditional staking works like this: you lock your coins, wait for rewards, and liquidity is frozen. When can you use it? You have no idea. ListaDAO’s idea is to invert this model: your staked assets also earn a "liquidity twin." For example, if you stake BNB in this protocol, you not only earn staking rewards but also receive an lstBNB token as a liquidity certificate. This certificate can continue to circulate in the market and even be used to participate in other DeFi strategies.
In other words, your assets are "split" into two versions: one continuously generating returns in the background, and the other remaining liquid in the front, ready to be traded at any time. This is what is called an "asset productive state"—no longer a binary choice (hold or trade), but the benefit of having both simultaneously.
This logic is completely different for investors with different risk preferences.
For example, if you are an investor optimistic about the privacy coin track but somewhat uneasy about short-term volatility, the conventional approach is: pour money into ZEN, then either hold, cut losses, or repeatedly stop-loss. ListaDAO’s approach is on a different dimension: you can use the interest-bearing stablecoins generated from staking to implement low-risk yield strategies, while leaving the growth potential of your main assets to the long-term narrative of privacy coins. The asset structure becomes more flexible, and the returns more three-dimensional.
There are many protocols like this in the market, but ListaDAO’s advantage lies in its obsession with capital efficiency. It is not simply stacking features but designing systematically so that every asset works according to the investor’s intent. This system is especially useful in a bear market.
Returning to the story of ZEN, why does Grayscale dare to buy when everyone else is cutting losses? On one hand, it’s a long-term confidence in the privacy narrative; on the other hand, their cost structure and holdings are different. Their assets can generate cash flow in various market environments, so short-term price pain points are less deadly.
This is the fundamental difference between institutions and retail investors—not capital size, but asset productivity.